BACKGROUND: Although the associations with cigarette smoking have been explored extensively for invasive breast cancer, the relation to in situ cancer has not previously been examined in depth. METHODS: We analyzed data from a population-based case-control study of women living in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Eligible cases of incident breast carcinoma in situ were reported to statewide registries in 1997-2001 (n = 1878); similarly aged controls (n = 8041) were randomly selected from population lists. Smoking history and other risk factor information were collected through structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated from logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: In multivariate models, the OR for breast carcinoma in situ among current smokers was 0.8, compared with never-smokers (95% CI = 0.7-1.0). Risk estimates increased towards the null with greater time since smoking cessation. Odds ratios were also less than 1.0 among women who initiated smoking in adolescence (OR = 0.8) or after a full-term birth (OR = 0.7), relative to women who never smoked. The reduced odds ratios associated with current smoking were strongest among women with annual screening mammograms (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.6-0.9). Odds ratios were not less than 1.0 among current smokers without a recent screening mammogram (1.3; 0.9-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an inverse association between current smoking and risk of breast carcinoma in situ among women undergoing breast cancer screening.
BACKGROUND: Although the associations with cigarette smoking have been explored extensively for invasive breast cancer, the relation to in situ cancer has not previously been examined in depth. METHODS: We analyzed data from a population-based case-control study of women living in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Eligible cases of incident breast carcinoma in situ were reported to statewide registries in 1997-2001 (n = 1878); similarly aged controls (n = 8041) were randomly selected from population lists. Smoking history and other risk factor information were collected through structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated from logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: In multivariate models, the OR for breast carcinoma in situ among current smokers was 0.8, compared with never-smokers (95% CI = 0.7-1.0). Risk estimates increased towards the null with greater time since smoking cessation. Odds ratios were also less than 1.0 among women who initiated smoking in adolescence (OR = 0.8) or after a full-term birth (OR = 0.7), relative to women who never smoked. The reduced odds ratios associated with current smoking were strongest among women with annual screening mammograms (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.6-0.9). Odds ratios were not less than 1.0 among current smokers without a recent screening mammogram (1.3; 0.9-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an inverse association between current smoking and risk of breast carcinoma in situ among women undergoing breast cancer screening.
Authors: Avonne E Connor; Kathy B Baumgartner; Richard N Baumgartner; Christina M Pinkston; Stephanie D Boone; Esther M John; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Lisa M Hines; Anna R Giuliano; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Vicki Hart McLaughlin; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb; Brian L Sprague Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Hazel B Nichols; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-04-02 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Mia M Gaudet; Brian D Carter; Louise A Brinton; Roni T Falk; Inger T Gram; Juhua Luo; Roger L Milne; Sarah J Nyante; Elisabete Weiderpass; Laura E Beane Freeman; Dale P Sandler; Kim Robien; Kristin E Anderson; Graham G Giles; Wendy Y Chen; Diane Feskanich; Tonje Braaten; Claudine Isaacs; Lesley M Butler; Woon-Puay Koh; Alicja Wolk; Hans-Olov Adami; Emily White; Karen L Margolis; Michael J Thun; Susan M Gapstur Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Jenny Sun; Dale P Sandler; Lisa A DeRoo; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Lindsay A Williams; Patricia Casbas-Hernandez; Hazel B Nichols; Chiu Kit Tse; Emma H Allott; Lisa A Carey; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240