OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relation between various food groups and the frequency of insulin resistance syndrome (IRS). DESIGN: A sample of 912 men aged 45-64 years was randomly selected. Questionnaires on risk factors and a three consecutive day food diary were completed. Height, weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure were measured. A fasting blood sample was analysed for lipid and glucose measurements. The NCEP-ATP-III definition was used to assess IRS. Data were analysed according to quintiles of food groups and medians of dairy products, fish, or cereal grains. RESULTS: The prevalence of IRS was 23.5%. It reached 29.0%, 28.1% and 28.1% when the intake was below the median for fish, dairy products, and grain, respectively. When consumptions of all three types of food were higher than the median, the prevalence reached 13.1%, and when they were lower, the prevalence was 37.9% (p<0.001). In logistic regression adjusted for confounders (centre, age, physical activities, education level, smoking, dieting, alcohol intake, treatments for hypertension and dyslipidaemia, energy intake, and diet quality index) the odds ratios for IRS (above median value v below) were 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.71) for fish, 0.67 (0.47 to 0.94) for dairy products, and 0.69 (0.47 to 1.01) for grain. When intakes of all three kinds of food were high, the OR was 0.22 (0.10 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: A high consumption of dairy products, fish, or cereal grains is associated with a lower probability of IRS. The probability decreases when intakes of all three types of food were high.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relation between various food groups and the frequency of insulin resistance syndrome (IRS). DESIGN: A sample of 912 men aged 45-64 years was randomly selected. Questionnaires on risk factors and a three consecutive day food diary were completed. Height, weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure were measured. A fasting blood sample was analysed for lipid and glucose measurements. The NCEP-ATP-III definition was used to assess IRS. Data were analysed according to quintiles of food groups and medians of dairy products, fish, or cereal grains. RESULTS: The prevalence of IRS was 23.5%. It reached 29.0%, 28.1% and 28.1% when the intake was below the median for fish, dairy products, and grain, respectively. When consumptions of all three types of food were higher than the median, the prevalence reached 13.1%, and when they were lower, the prevalence was 37.9% (p<0.001). In logistic regression adjusted for confounders (centre, age, physical activities, education level, smoking, dieting, alcohol intake, treatments for hypertension and dyslipidaemia, energy intake, and diet quality index) the odds ratios for IRS (above median value v below) were 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.71) for fish, 0.67 (0.47 to 0.94) for dairy products, and 0.69 (0.47 to 1.01) for grain. When intakes of all three kinds of food were high, the OR was 0.22 (0.10 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: A high consumption of dairy products, fish, or cereal grains is associated with a lower probability of IRS. The probability decreases when intakes of all three types of food were high.
Authors: R M Krauss; R H Eckel; B Howard; L J Appel; S R Daniels; R J Deckelbaum; J W Erdman; P Kris-Etherton; I J Goldberg; T A Kotchen; A H Lichtenstein; W E Mitch; R Mullis; K Robinson; J Wylie-Rosett; S St Jeor; J Suttie; D L Tribble; T L Bazzarre Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K Kuulasmaa; H Tunstall-Pedoe; A Dobson; S Fortmann; S Sans; H Tolonen; A Evans; M Ferrario; J Tuomilehto Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-02-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A E Evans; J B Ruidavets; E E McCrum; J P Cambou; R McClean; P Douste-Blazy; D McMaster; A Bingham; C C Patterson; J L Richard Journal: QJM Date: 1995-07
Authors: Pablo Pérez-Martínez; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Vasilios G Athyros; Mónica Bullo; Patrick Couture; María I Covas; Lawrence de Koning; Javier Delgado-Lista; Andrés Díaz-López; Christian A Drevon; Ramón Estruch; Katherine Esposito; Montserrat Fitó; Marta Garaulet; Dario Giugliano; Antonio García-Ríos; Niki Katsiki; Genovefa Kolovou; Benoît Lamarche; Maria Ida Maiorino; Guillermo Mena-Sánchez; Araceli Muñoz-Garach; Dragana Nikolic; José M Ordovás; Francisco Pérez-Jiménez; Manfredi Rizzo; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Helmut Schröder; Francisco J Tinahones; Rafael de la Torre; Ben van Ommen; Suzan Wopereis; Emilio Ros; José López-Miranda Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: V Bongard; D Arveiler; J Dallongeville; J-B Ruidavets; A Wagner; C Simon; N Marécaux; J Ferrières Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Lu-Te Chuang; Robert H Glew; Chia-Chun Li; Dorothy J VanderJagt; Julie S Broyles; Gretchen M Ray; Vallabh O Shah Journal: J Diabetes Mellitus Date: 2012-11
Authors: F Zaribaf; E Falahi; F Barak; M Heidari; A H Keshteli; A Yazdannik; A Esmaillzadeh Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Yong-Seok Kim; Pengcheng Xun; Carlos Iribarren; Linda Van Horn; Lyn Steffen; Martha L Daviglus; David Siscovick; Kiang Liu; Ka He Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Robert C Block; Ann M Dozier; Leslie Hazel-Fernandez; Joseph J Guido; Thomas A Pearson Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Geertruida J van Woudenbergh; Adriana J van Ballegooijen; Anneleen Kuijsten; Eric J G Sijbrands; Frank J A van Rooij; Johanna M Geleijnse; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Edith J M Feskens Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 19.112