Literature DB >> 17699531

Randomised controlled trial of home-based walking programmes at and below current recommended levels of exercise in sedentary adults.

Mark A Tully1, Margaret E Cupples, Nigel D Hart, Jane McEneny, Kieran J McGlade, Wai-Sun Chan, Ian S Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine, using unsupervised walking programmes, the effects of exercise at a level lower than currently recommended to improve cardiovascular risk factors and functional capacity.
DESIGN: 12 week randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Northern Ireland Civil Service; home-based walking. PARTICIPANTS: 106 healthy, sedentary 40 to 61 year old adults of both sexes.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to a walking programme (30 minutes brisk walking three days a week (n = 44) or five days a week (n = 42)) or a control group (n = 20). Participants could choose to walk in bouts of at least 10 minutes. They used pedometers to record numbers of steps taken. Intention to treat analysis of changes within groups was done using paired t tests; extent of change (baseline to 12 week measurements) was compared between groups using analysis of variance and Gabriel's post hoc test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, serum lipids, body mass index, waist:hip ratio, and functional capacity (using a 10 m shuttle walk test). MAIN
RESULTS: 89% (93/106) completed the study. Systolic blood pressure and waist and hip circumferences fell significantly both in the three day group (5 mm Hg, 2.6 cm, and 2.4 cm, respectively) and in the five day group (6 mm Hg, 2.5 cm, and 2.2 cm) (p<0.05). Functional capacity increased in both groups (15%; 11%). Diastolic blood pressure fell in the five day group (3.4 mm Hg, p<0.05). No changes occurred in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of benefit from exercising at a level below that currently recommended in healthy sedentary adults. Further studies are needed of potential longer term health benefits for a wider community from low levels of exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17699531      PMCID: PMC2660000          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.053058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  24 in total

1.  Walking and resting blood pressure in adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G A Kelley; K S Kelley; Z V Tran
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Speed and exercise intensity of recreational walkers.

Authors:  Elaine M Murtagh; Colin A G Boreham; Marie H Murphy
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Cholesterol reduction and increased cardiovascular fitness following a 12 weeks brisk walking.

Authors:  T Paillard; C Lafont; M C Costes-Salon; P Dupui; D Riviere; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Challenges faced in recruiting patients from primary care practices into a physical activity intervention trial. Activity Counseling Trial Research Group.

Authors:  S Margitić; M A Sevick; M Miller; C Albright; J Banton; K Callahan; M Garcia; L Gibbons; B J Levine; R Anderson; W Ettinger
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Increasing daily walking lowers blood pressure in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K L Moreau; R Degarmo; J Langley; C McMahon; E T Howley; D R Bassett; D L Thompson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups.

Authors:  P Z Siegel; R M Brackbill; G W Heath
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Brisk walking and serum lipid and lipoprotein variables in previously sedentary women--effect of 12 weeks of regular brisk walking followed by 12 weeks of detraining.

Authors:  A E Hardman; A Hudson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Comparison of oxygen uptake during a conventional treadmill test and the shuttle walking test in chronic airflow limitation.

Authors:  S J Singh; M D Morgan; A E Hardman; C Rowe; P A Bardsley
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose-response relation?

Authors:  I M Lee; P J Skerrett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment.

Authors:  L Roe; C Strong; C Whiteside; A Neil; D Mant
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  18 in total

1.  Low-volume walking program improves cardiovascular-related health in older adults.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Park; Masashi Miyashita; Masaki Takahashi; Noriaki Kawanishi; Harumi Hayashida; Hyun-Shik Kim; Katsuhiko Suzuki; Yoshio Nakamura
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Long-term physical activity outcomes of home-based lifestyle interventions among breast and prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Allison J Ottenbacher; R Sue Day; Wendell C Taylor; Shreela V Sharma; Richard Sloane; Denise C Snyder; Isaac M Lipkus; Lee W Jones; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Physiotherapy for sleep disturbance in chronic low back pain: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Deirdre A Hurley; Jennifer Eadie; Grainne O'Donoghue; Clare Kelly; Chris Lonsdale; Suzanne Guerin; Mark A Tully; Willem van Mechelen; Suzanne M McDonough; Colin A G Boreham; Conor Heneghan; Leslie Daly
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The back 2 activity trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Suzanne M McDonough; Mark A Tully; Seán R O'Connor; Adele Boyd; Daniel P Kerr; Siobhán M O'Neill; Antony Delitto; Ian Bradbury; Catrine Tudor-Locke; David G Baxter; Deirdre A Hurley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Reduced diabetic, hypertensive, and cholesterol medication use with walking.

Authors:  Paul T Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Walking for hypertension.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Lee; Caroline A Mulvaney; Yoko Kin Yoke Wong; Edwin Sy Chan; Michael C Watson; Hui-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-24

7.  Does physical activity counselling enhance the effects of a pedometer-based intervention over the long-term: 12-month findings from the Walking for Wellbeing in the west study.

Authors:  Claire F Fitzsimons; Graham Baker; Stuart R Gray; Myra A Nimmo; Nanette Mutrie
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Confusion and conflict in assessing the physical activity status of middle-aged men.

Authors:  Dylan Thompson; Alan M Batterham; Daniella Markovitch; Natalie C Dixon; Adam J S Lund; Jean-Philippe Walhin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A walking programme and a supervised exercise class versus usual physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. (The Supervised Walking In comparison to Fitness Training for Back Pain (SWIFT) Trial).

Authors:  Deirdre A Hurley; Grainne O'Donoghue; Mark A Tully; Jennifer Klaber Moffett; Willem van Mechelen; Leslie Daly; Colin Ag Boreham; Suzanne M McDonough
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Do walking strategies to increase physical activity reduce reported sitting in workplaces: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Nicholas D Gilson; Anna Puig-Ribera; Jim McKenna; Wendy J Brown; Nicola W Burton; Carlton B Cooke
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.