Literature DB >> 17699347

Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: patients' assessment of their satisfaction with therapy and the impact of the therapy on their lives.

Erika Juergensen1, Diane Wuerth, Susan H Finkelstein, Peter H Juergensen, Ambek Bekui, Fredric O Finkelstein.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to examine patient satisfaction with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) therapies, focusing attention on the positive and negative impact of the therapies on patients' lives. Patients were recruited from a free-standing PD unit and two free-standing HD units. A total of 94% (n = 62) of eligible PD and 84% (n = 84) of eligible HD patients participated. HD patients were significantly older and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than the PD patients, but there were no differences in duration of dialysis treatment, prevalence of diabetes, educational backgrounds, or home situations. Patients were asked to rate their overall satisfaction with and the overall impact of their dialysis therapy on their lives, using a 1 to 10 Likert scale. In addition, patients were asked to rate the impact of their therapy on 15 domains that had been cited previously as being important for patients' quality of life. The mean satisfaction score for PD patients (8.02 +/- 1.41) was higher than for HD patients (7.4 +/- 1.4; P = 0.15). PD patients indicated that there was less impact of the dialysis treatment on their lives globally (7.25 +/- 2.12 versus 6.19 +/- 2.83; P = 0.019). In addition, PD patients noted less impact of the therapy in 14 of the 15 domains examined. With the use of a proportional odds model analysis, the only significant predictor of overall satisfaction and impact of therapy was dialysis modality (P = 0.037 and P = 0.021, respectively). Patients also were asked to comment freely on the positive and negative effects of the dialysis treatments on their lives, and a taxonomy of patient perceptions and concerns was developed. This study suggests that PD patients in general are more satisfied with their overall care and believe that their treatment has less impact on their lives than HD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17699347     DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01220406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  59 in total

1.  Managing Kidney Failure with Home Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Ali Ibrahim; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Guidelines for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Haggerty; Scott Roth; Danielle Walsh; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Raymond Price; Robert D Fanelli; Todd Penner; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used.

Authors:  Monika A Krezalek; Nicolas Bonamici; Kristine Kuchta; Brittany Lapin; JoAnn Carbray; Woody Denham; John Linn; Michael Ujiki; Stephen P Haggerty
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Variation in initial kidney replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Devlin; Sushrut S Waikar; Daniel H Solomon; Bing Lu; Tamara Shaykevich; Graciela S Alarcón; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 5.  How to overcome barriers and establish a successful home HD program.

Authors:  Bessie A Young; Christopher Chan; Christopher Blagg; Robert Lockridge; Thomas Golper; Fred Finkelstein; Rachel Shaffer; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Assessing and improving the health-related quality of life of patients with ESRD.

Authors:  Fredric O Finkelstein; Kelli L Arsenault; Ana Taveras; Kwabena Awuah; Susan H Finkelstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  An assessment of the quality of life in hemodialysis patients using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire.

Authors:  B S Sathvik; G Parthasarathi; M G Narahari; K C Gurudev
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2008-10

8.  Factors affecting hemodialysis patients' satisfaction with their dialysis therapy.

Authors:  M Al Eissa; M Al Sulaiman; M Jondeby; A Karkar; M Barahmein; F A M Shaheen; A Al Sayyari
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-25

9.  Broadening Options for Long-term Dialysis in the Elderly (BOLDE): differences in quality of life on peritoneal dialysis compared to haemodialysis for older patients.

Authors:  Edwina A Brown; Lina Johansson; Ken Farrington; Hugh Gallagher; Tom Sensky; Fabiana Gordon; Maria Da Silva-Gane; Nigel Beckett; Mary Hickson
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Quality of life and emotional distress between patients on peritoneal dialysis versus community-based hemodialysis.

Authors:  K Griva; A W Kang; Z L Yu; N K Mooppil; M Foo; Choong Meng Chan; S P Newman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.