Literature DB >> 17699216

The personal dialysis capacity test is superior to the peritoneal equilibration test to discriminate inflammation as the cause of fast transport status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Wim Van Biesen1, Arjan Van der Tol, Nic Veys, Clement Dequidt, Denise Vijt, Norbert Lameire, Raymond Vanholder.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the potential of the Personal Dialysis Capacity (PDC) test to discriminate fast transport status (FTS) as a consequence of inflammation versus FTS because of other causes. This distinction is important because new therapeutic options such as icodextrin and automated peritoneal dialysis can abolish the negative impact on outcome of FTS if fast transport is not caused by inflammation. A PDC test and a Peritoneal Equilibration Test (PET) were performed in 135 incident PD patients. Membrane characteristics were related with baseline biochemical parameters and C-reactive protein. After correction for other covariates, only large pore flux (J(v)L) but not surface area over diffusion distance (A0/dX) or dialysate over plasma concentration was related to C-reactive protein. Using the PDC test for detection of inflammation, positive and negative predictive values were 16/36 and 80/99, respectively, whereas with PET, positive predictive value was 5/20 and negative predictive value 92/115 (chi2 = 0.009). In a Cox regression for patient survival with correction for age, a J(v)L higher than expected by the surface area over diffusion distance, predicted outcome (P = 0.04). Patients with inflammation had a higher J(v)L (0.21 +/- 0.12 versus 0.17 +/- 0.09; P = 0.06) and a lower ultrafiltration (89 +/- 631 versus 386 +/- 601 ml/d; P = 0.06) and urine output (878.45 +/- 533.55 versus 1322 +/- 822 ml/d; P = 0.023) than patients without inflammation. There was no difference for surface area over diffusion distance (A0/dX) or dialysate over plasma concentration. A PDC test yields far more information about the peritoneal membrane characteristics than a PET. A J(v)L higher than expected by the A0/dX is an indicator of inflammation and is related to an increased mortality. The PET is not able to discriminate between FTS because of inflammation versus because of anatomic reasons, whereas the PDC test does.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17699216     DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00820805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  15 in total

1.  Peritoneal albumin and protein losses do not predict outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Olga Balafa; Nynke Halbesma; Dirk G Struijk; Friedo W Dekker; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Protecting the peritoneal membrane: factors beyond peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Anneleen Pletinck; Raymond Vanholder; Nic Veys; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 3.  Peritoneal dialysis prescription in children: bedside principles for optimal practice.

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Evolution Over Time of Volume Status and PD-Related Practice Patterns in an Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Cohort.

Authors:  Wim Van Biesen; Christian Verger; James Heaf; François Vrtovsnik; Zita M Leme Britto; Jun-Young Do; Mario Prieto-Velasco; Juan Pérez Martínez; Carlo Crepaldi; Tatiana De Los Ríos; Adelheid Gauly; Katharina Ihle; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Hypoalbuminaemia, systemic albumin leak and endothelial dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Zanzhe Yu; Boon Kay Tan; Stephen Dainty; Derek L Mattey; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Peritoneal protein leakage, systemic inflammation, and peritonitis risk in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Jie Dong; Yuan Chen; Suping Luo; Rong Xu; Ying Xu
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Peritoneal protein clearance and not peritoneal membrane transport status predicts survival in a contemporary cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Kit Huckvale; Michelle Chellar; Biju John; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Longitudinal study of small solute transport and peritoneal protein clearance in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Zanzhe Yu; Mark Lambie; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Measuring peritoneal absorption with the prolonged peritoneal equilibration test from 4 to 8 hours using various glucose concentrations.

Authors:  Josep Teixidó-Planas; Maria Isabel Troya-Saborido; Guillermo Pedreira-Robles; Milagros Del-Rio-Lafuente; Ramon Romero-Gonzalez; Josep Bonet-Sol
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Hydration status does not influence peritoneal equilibration test ultrafiltration volumes.

Authors:  Andrew Davenport; Michelle Kay Willicombe
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.