Literature DB >> 17698950

Declines in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a screening mammography population.

Karla Kerlikowske1, Diana L Miglioretti, Diana S M Buist, Rod Walker, Patricia A Carney.   

Abstract

Whether a recent large decline in use of postmenopausal hormone therapy after the release of the Women's Health Initiative findings in July 2002 and/or a decline in screening mammography use is related to a recently reported decline in breast cancer incidence in the United States is controversial. We prospectively collected data from four screening mammography registries from January 1997 through December 2003 for 603411 screening mammography examinations performed on women aged 50-69 years. Of these women, 3238 were diagnosed with breast cancer within 12 months of a screening examination. We calculated quarterly rates of self-reported current postmenopausal hormone therapy use and of invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive breast cancer adjusted for age, registry, and time between screening examinations. All statistical tests were two-sided. Between 2000 and 2002 and between 2002 and 2003, annual rates of postmenopausal hormone therapy use declined by 7% and 34%, respectively (P(trend) < .001 for both). Between 2000 and 2003, annual rates of invasive cancer declined by 5% (P(trend) = .003). Between 2001 and 2003, annual rates of ER-positive invasive breast cancer declined by 13% (P(trend) = .002). Rates of DCIS were stable during the study period. Our finding of a statistically significant decline in the rate of ER-positive invasive breast cancer in a screening mammography population after the start of a concomitant substantial decline in postmenopausal hormone therapy use suggests that a decline in screening mammography rates is unlikely to account for the recent decline in US breast cancer incidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698950     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  48 in total

1.  Screening mammography use among current, former, and never hormone therapy users may not explain recent declines in breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Rod Walker; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Walter Clinton; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.

Authors:  Laura E Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Melissa L Anderson; Stephen H Taplin; Berta M Geller; R James Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Natasha K Stout; Dennis G Fryback; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Benjamin A Herman; Lucy G Hannah; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Body mass index and breast cancer risk according to postmenopausal estrogen-progestin use and hormone receptor status.

Authors:  Mark F Munsell; Brian L Sprague; Donald A Berry; Gary Chisholm; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Risk Factors That Increase Risk of Estrogen Receptor-Positive and -Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Charlotte C Gard; Jeffrey A Tice; Elad Ziv; Steven R Cummings; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  GPR30 and estrogen receptor expression: new insights into hormone dependence of inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Hugo Arias-Pulido; Melanie Royce; Yun Gong; Nancy Joste; Lesley Lomo; Sang-Joon Lee; Nabila Chaher; Claire Verschraegen; Juanita Lara; Eric R Prossnitz; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia have declined with less use of postmenopausal hormone treatment: findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Tehillah S Menes; Karla Kerlikowske; Shabnam Jaffer; Deborah Seger; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Menopausal hormone therapy in relation to breast cancer characteristics and prognosis: a cohort study.

Authors:  Lena U Rosenberg; Fredrik Granath; Paul W Dickman; Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Sara Wedrén; Ingemar Persson; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Recent trends in breast cancer incidence in US white women by county-level urban/rural and poverty status.

Authors:  Amelia K Hausauer; Theresa H M Keegan; Ellen T Chang; Sally L Glaser; Holly Howe; Christina A Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Recent changes in breast cancer incidence in Spain, 1980-2004.

Authors:  Marina Pollán; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Eva Ardanaz; Marcial Argüelles; Carmen Martos; Jaume Galcerán; María-José Sánchez-Pérez; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Nerea Larrañaga; Ruth Martínez-Cobo; María-Cres Tobalina; Enrique Vidal; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Antonio Mateos; Isabel Garau; María-Dolores Rojas-Martín; Rosario Jiménez; Ana Torrella-Ramos; Josefina Perucha; Maria-Eugenia Pérez-de-Rada; Susana González; María-José Rabanaque; Joan Borràs; Carmen Navarro; Esther Hernández; Angel Izquierdo; Gonzalo López-Abente; Carmen Martínez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.