Literature DB >> 17698936

A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion.

Alessio Farcomeni1.   

Abstract

In the last decade a growing amount of statistical research has been devoted to multiple testing, motivated by a variety of applications in medicine, bioinformatics, genomics, brain imaging, etc. Research in this area is focused on developing powerful procedures even when the number of tests is very large. This paper attempts to review research in modern multiple hypothesis testing with particular attention to the false discovery proportion, loosely defined as the number of false rejections divided by the number of rejections. We review the main ideas, stepwise and augmentation procedures; and resampling based testing. We also discuss the problem of dependence among the test statistics. Simulations make a comparison between the procedures and with Bayesian methods. We illustrate the procedures in applications in DNA microarray data analysis. Finally, few possibilities for further research are highlighted.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698936     DOI: 10.1177/0962280206079046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  39 in total

1.  Enhancing speech learning by combining task practice with periods of stimulus exposure without practice.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Melissa M Baese-Berk; Nicole Marrone; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Use of big data in drug development for precision medicine.

Authors:  Rosa S Kim; Nicolas Goossens; Yujin Hoshida
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 3.  Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review.

Authors:  David M Groppe; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Chen; Zhe Feng; Xiaolian Yi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  The effect of correlation in false discovery rate estimation.

Authors:  Armin Schwartzman; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Gastric cancer drug trials - are women second class citizens?

Authors:  Manish A Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  A strategy analysis for genetic association studies with known inbreeding.

Authors:  Stefano Cabras; Maria Eugenia Castellanos; Ginevra Biino; Ivana Persico; Alessandro Sassu; Laura Casula; Stefano Del Giacco; Francesco Bertolino; Mario Pirastu; Nicola Pirastu
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Divergent Specificity Development of IgG1 and IgG4 Autoantibodies in Endemic Pemphigus Foliaceus (Fogo Selvagem).

Authors:  Mike Maldonado; Luis A Diaz; Phillip Prisayanh; Jinsheng Yang; Bahjat F Qaqish; Valeria Aoki; Gunter Hans-Filho; Evandro A Rivitti; Donna A Culton; Ye Qian
Journal:  Immunohorizons       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  The protective effect of community factors on childhood asthma.

Authors:  Ruchi S Gupta; Xingyou Zhang; Lisa K Sharp; John J Shannon; Kevin B Weiss
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  A new multitest correction (SGoF) that increases its statistical power when increasing the number of tests.

Authors:  Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; Jacobo de Uña-Alvarez; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.