BACKGROUND: Asthma burden in the US is not evenly distributed. Although asthma prevalence varies widely across urban neighborhoods, little attention has been paid to the community as a key contributor. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of positive socio-environmental community factors on childhood asthma prevalence in Chicago. METHODS: From 2003 to 2005, an asthma screening survey was conducted among children attending Chicago Public/Catholic schools from kindergarten through eighth grade. One hundred five schools participated, yielding a stratified representation of 4 race-income groups. Positive community factors, such as social capital, economic potential, and community amenities, were assessed by using the Metro Chicago Information Center's Community Vitality Index. RESULTS: Of the surveys returned, 45,177 (92%) were geocoded into 287 neighborhoods. Neighborhoods were divided into quartile groups by asthma prevalence (mean, 8%, 12%, 17%, 25%). Community vitality (54% vs 44%; P < .0001) and economic potential (64% vs 38%; P < .0001) were significantly higher in neighborhoods with low asthma prevalence. Neighborhood interaction (36% vs 73%; P < .0001) and stability (40% vs 53%; P < .0001) were significantly higher in neighborhoods with high asthma prevalence. Overall, positive factors explained 21% of asthma variation. Childhood asthma increased as the black population increased in a community (P < .0001). Accordingly, race/ethnicity was controlled. In black neighborhoods, these factors remained significantly higher in neighborhoods with low asthma prevalence. When considered alongside socio-demographic/individual characteristics, overall community vitality as well as social capital continued to contribute significantly to asthma variation. CONCLUSION: Asthma prevalence in Chicago is strongly associated with socio-environmental factors thought to enrich a community. A deeper understanding of this impact may lend insight into interventions to reduce childhood asthma.
BACKGROUND:Asthma burden in the US is not evenly distributed. Although asthma prevalence varies widely across urban neighborhoods, little attention has been paid to the community as a key contributor. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of positive socio-environmental community factors on childhood asthma prevalence in Chicago. METHODS: From 2003 to 2005, an asthma screening survey was conducted among children attending Chicago Public/Catholic schools from kindergarten through eighth grade. One hundred five schools participated, yielding a stratified representation of 4 race-income groups. Positive community factors, such as social capital, economic potential, and community amenities, were assessed by using the Metro Chicago Information Center's Community Vitality Index. RESULTS: Of the surveys returned, 45,177 (92%) were geocoded into 287 neighborhoods. Neighborhoods were divided into quartile groups by asthma prevalence (mean, 8%, 12%, 17%, 25%). Community vitality (54% vs 44%; P < .0001) and economic potential (64% vs 38%; P < .0001) were significantly higher in neighborhoods with low asthma prevalence. Neighborhood interaction (36% vs 73%; P < .0001) and stability (40% vs 53%; P < .0001) were significantly higher in neighborhoods with high asthma prevalence. Overall, positive factors explained 21% of asthma variation. Childhood asthma increased as the black population increased in a community (P < .0001). Accordingly, race/ethnicity was controlled. In black neighborhoods, these factors remained significantly higher in neighborhoods with low asthma prevalence. When considered alongside socio-demographic/individual characteristics, overall community vitality as well as social capital continued to contribute significantly to asthma variation. CONCLUSION: Asthma prevalence in Chicago is strongly associated with socio-environmental factors thought to enrich a community. A deeper understanding of this impact may lend insight into interventions to reduce childhood asthma.
Authors: W James Gauderman; Edward Avol; Frank Gilliland; Hita Vora; Duncan Thomas; Kiros Berhane; Rob McConnell; Nino Kuenzli; Fred Lurmann; Edward Rappaport; Helene Margolis; David Bates; John Peters Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wayne J Morgan; Ellen F Crain; Rebecca S Gruchalla; George T O'Connor; Meyer Kattan; Richard Evans; James Stout; George Malindzak; Ernestine Smartt; Marshall Plaut; Michelle Walter; Benjamin Vaughn; Herman Mitchell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth C Matsui; Robert A Wood; Cynthia Rand; Sukon Kanchanaraksa; Lee Swartz; Peyton A Eggleston Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Rosalind J Wright; Herman Mitchell; Cynthia M Visness; Sheldon Cohen; James Stout; Richard Evans; Diane R Gold Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ruchi S Gupta; Claudia H Lau; Christopher M Warren; Alexandra Lelchuk; Amber Alencar; Elizabeth E Springston; Jane L Holl Journal: J Community Health Date: 2013-06
Authors: Andrew F Beck; Bin Huang; Kathryn Wheeler; Nikki R Lawson; Robert S Kahn; Carley L Riley Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Omar Olmedo; Inge F Goldstein; Luis Acosta; Adnan Divjan; Andrew G Rundle; Ginger L Chew; Robert B Mellins; Lori Hoepner; Howard Andrews; Sara Lopez-Pintado; James W Quinn; Frederica P Perera; Rachel L Miller; Judith S Jacobson; Matthew S Perzanowski Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Andrew F Beck; Terri Moncrief; Bin Huang; Jeffrey M Simmons; Hadley Sauers; Chen Chen; Robert S Kahn Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Joseph A Caruso; Kezhong Zhang; Nicholas J Schroeck; Benjamin McCoy; Shawn P McElmurry Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.390