Literature DB >> 17697448

Interracial prison contact: the pros for (socially dominant) cons.

Gordon Hodson1.   

Abstract

Individuals high in social dominance orientation (SDO; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) endorse group hierarchies and social inequality. Surprisingly little research has addressed contextual factors associated with reduced intergroup biases among such individuals. The present investigation considers a Person x Situation approach to this question in two British prisons, exploring the contextual factors outlined in the Contact Hypothesis (Allport, 1954). White inmates scoring higher in SDO exhibited significantly less in-group bias when reporting increased contact with Black inmates (Studies 1 & 2), when perceiving that favourable contact conditions are institutionally supported (Study 1), or when experiencing more pleasant personal interactions with Black inmates (Study 2). These SDO x Contact Condition moderation effects were mediated in Study 2: among high-SDO individuals, increased empathy towards Black inmates mediated the relation between contact variables and lower in-group bias. Implications for considering individual differences and empathy in contact settings are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17697448     DOI: 10.1348/014466607X231109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  5 in total

1.  Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations.

Authors:  Daniel L Rosenfeld; Emily Balcetis; Brock Bastian; Elliot T Berkman; Jennifer K Bosson; Tiffany N Brannon; Anthony L Burrow; C Daryl Cameron; Serena Chen; Jonathan E Cook; Christian Crandall; Shai Davidai; Kristof Dhont; Paul W Eastwick; Sarah E Gaither; Steven W Gangestad; Thomas Gilovich; Kurt Gray; Elizabeth L Haines; Martie G Haselton; Nick Haslam; Gordon Hodson; Michael A Hogg; Matthew J Hornsey; Yuen J Huo; Samantha Joel; Frank J Kachanoff; Gordon Kraft-Todd; Mark R Leary; Alison Ledgerwood; Randy T Lee; Steve Loughnan; Cara C MacInnis; Traci Mann; Damian R Murray; Carolyn Parkinson; Efrén O Pérez; Tom Pyszczynski; Kaylin Ratner; Hank Rothgerber; James D Rounds; Mark Schaller; Roxane Cohen Silver; Barbara A Spellman; Nina Strohminger; Janet K Swim; Felix Thoemmes; Betul Urganci; Joseph A Vandello; Sarah Volz; Vivian Zayas; A Janet Tomiyama
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

2.  Facing Our Fears: The Impact of a 4-Day Training Intervention to Reduce Negative Perspectives on Sexual and Gender Minorities among Religious Leaders in Kenya.

Authors:  David Kuria Mbote; Esther Mombo; Zablon Bundi Mutongu; Anthony Mkutu; Adam Ciarleglio; Theo G M Sandfort
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2021-04-19

3.  How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations.

Authors:  Cara C MacInnis; Elizabeth Page-Gould
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05

4.  Intergroup Contact Effects via Ingroup Distancing among Majority and Minority Groups: Moderation by Social Dominance Orientation.

Authors:  Mathias Kauff; Katharina Schmid; Simon Lolliot; Ananthi Al Ramiah; Miles Hewstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Social Dominance Orientation, Dispositional Empathy, and Need for Cognitive Closure Moderate the Impact of Empathy-Skills Training, but Not Patient Contact, on Medical Students' Negative Attitudes toward Higher-Weight Patients.

Authors:  Angela Meadows; Suzanne Higgs; Sara E Burke; John F Dovidio; Michelle van Ryn; Sean M Phelan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.