PURPOSE: To evaluate pulsatility and movement along the ascending thoracic aorta using dynamic electrocardiographically-gated 64-slice cine computed tomographic angiography (CTA). METHODS: Diameter and area change and center of mass (COM) movement of the ascending thoracic aorta was determined per cardiac cycle in 15 patients at surgically relevant anatomical levels: (A) 5 mm distal to the coronary arteries, (B) 5 mm proximal to the innominate artery, and (C) halfway up the ascending aorta. Additionally, COM movement was determined 1 cm (level P) and 2 cm (level Q) distal from the origins of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries. Eight gated datasets covering the cardiac cycle were used to reconstruct images at each level perpendicular to the aortic lumen. The distance between important anatomical landmarks was determined. RESULTS: All levels showed significant cardiac cycle-induced diameter and area changes (p<0.001), with the largest pulsatility 5 mm distal to the coronary arteries. Mean maximum diameter changes were (A) 17.4%+/-4.8% (range 7.5%-27.5%), (B) 13.9%+/-3.5% (range 10.6%-25.0%), and (C) 12.9%+/-3.4% (8.3%-19.6%). Mean area changes were (A) 12.7%+/-5.5% (range 4.3%-21.8%), (B) 7.5%+/-2.0% (range 4.1%-11.0%), and (C) 5.6%+/-2.2% (range 1.9%-11.4%). Mean maximum COM movements were (A) 6.1+/-2.0 mm (range 2.7-9.0), (B) 2.3+/-1.1 mm (range 1.1-5.6), and (C) 3.6+/-1.5 mm (range 1.4-6.5). Mean COM movements of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries, respectively, were (P) 1.9+/-0.7 mm (range 0.9-3.7), 2.4+/-0.6 mm (range 1.4-3.3), and 1.9+/-0.6 mm (range 0.8-2.8), and (Q) 1.8+/-0.7 mm (range 0.8-3.5), 1.8+/-0.6 mm (range 0.8-2.7), 1.9+/-0.6 mm (range 1.1-3.4). CONCLUSION: The dynamics of the ascending thoracic aorta and the arch vessels are impressive, showing a wide range of 3-dimensional motions. Future ascending arch branched and fenestrated thoracic endograft designs must consider this active local environment, as it may have implications for durability, sealing, and ultimate clinical success.
PURPOSE: To evaluate pulsatility and movement along the ascending thoracic aorta using dynamic electrocardiographically-gated 64-slice cine computed tomographic angiography (CTA). METHODS: Diameter and area change and center of mass (COM) movement of the ascending thoracic aorta was determined per cardiac cycle in 15 patients at surgically relevant anatomical levels: (A) 5 mm distal to the coronary arteries, (B) 5 mm proximal to the innominate artery, and (C) halfway up the ascending aorta. Additionally, COM movement was determined 1 cm (level P) and 2 cm (level Q) distal from the origins of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries. Eight gated datasets covering the cardiac cycle were used to reconstruct images at each level perpendicular to the aortic lumen. The distance between important anatomical landmarks was determined. RESULTS: All levels showed significant cardiac cycle-induced diameter and area changes (p<0.001), with the largest pulsatility 5 mm distal to the coronary arteries. Mean maximum diameter changes were (A) 17.4%+/-4.8% (range 7.5%-27.5%), (B) 13.9%+/-3.5% (range 10.6%-25.0%), and (C) 12.9%+/-3.4% (8.3%-19.6%). Mean area changes were (A) 12.7%+/-5.5% (range 4.3%-21.8%), (B) 7.5%+/-2.0% (range 4.1%-11.0%), and (C) 5.6%+/-2.2% (range 1.9%-11.4%). Mean maximum COM movements were (A) 6.1+/-2.0 mm (range 2.7-9.0), (B) 2.3+/-1.1 mm (range 1.1-5.6), and (C) 3.6+/-1.5 mm (range 1.4-6.5). Mean COM movements of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries, respectively, were (P) 1.9+/-0.7 mm (range 0.9-3.7), 2.4+/-0.6 mm (range 1.4-3.3), and 1.9+/-0.6 mm (range 0.8-2.8), and (Q) 1.8+/-0.7 mm (range 0.8-3.5), 1.8+/-0.6 mm (range 0.8-2.7), 1.9+/-0.6 mm (range 1.1-3.4). CONCLUSION: The dynamics of the ascending thoracic aorta and the arch vessels are impressive, showing a wide range of 3-dimensional motions. Future ascending arch branched and fenestrated thoracic endograft designs must consider this active local environment, as it may have implications for durability, sealing, and ultimate clinical success.
Authors: Cormac Farrelly; Amir Davarpanah; Aoife N Keeling; John Sheehan; Ann Ragin; Vahid Yaghmai; James C Carr Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Guido H W van Bogerijen; Jip L Tolenaar; Michele Conti; Ferdinando Auricchio; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Frans L Moll; Joost A van Herwaarden; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Santi Trimarchi Journal: Aorta (Stamford) Date: 2013-08-01
Authors: Tim F Weber; Maria-Katharina Ganten; Dittmar Böckler; Philipp Geisbüsch; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tim F Weber; Tobias Müller; Andreas Biesdorf; Stefan Wörz; Fabian Rengier; Tobias Heye; Tim Holland-Letz; Karl Rohr; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Tri-Linh C Lu; Christoph H Huber; Elena Rizzo; Jashmid Dehmeshki; Ludwig K von Segesser; Salah D Qanadli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Guido H W van Bogerijen; Joost A van Herwaarden; Michele Conti; Ferdinando Auricchio; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Santi Trimarchi; Frans L Moll Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2014-05
Authors: Foeke J H Nauta; Guido H W van Bogerijen; Michele Conti; Chiara Trentin; Frans L Moll; Joost A Van Herwaarden; Ferdinando Auricchio; Santi Trimarchi Journal: Aorta (Stamford) Date: 2017-04-01