Literature DB >> 17694865

Geometry-adapted hexahedral meshes improve accuracy of finite-element-method-based EEG source analysis.

Carsten H Wolters1, Alfred Anwander, Guntram Berti, Ulrich Hartmann.   

Abstract

Mesh generation in finite-element- (FE) method-based electroencephalography (EEG) source analysis generally influences greatly the accuracy of the results. It is thus important to determine a meshing strategy well adopted to achieve both acceptable accuracy for potential distributions and reasonable computation times and memory usage. In this paper, we propose to achieve this goal by smoothing regular hexahedral finite elements at material interfaces using a node-shift approach. We first present the underlying theory for two different techniques for modeling a current dipole in FE volume conductors, a subtraction and a direct potential method. We then evaluate regular and smoothed elements in a four-layer sphere model for both potential approaches and compare their accuracy. We finally compute and visualize potential distributions for a tangentially and a radially oriented source in the somatosensory cortex in regular and geometry-adapted three-compartment hexahedra FE volume conductor models of the human head using both the subtraction and the direct potential method. On the average, node-shifting reduces both topography and magnitude errors by more than a factor of 2 for tangential and 1.5 for radial sources for both potential approaches. Nevertheless, node-shifting has to be carried out with caution for sources located within or close to irregular hexahedra, because especially for the subtraction method extreme deformations might lead to larger overall errors. With regard to realistic volume conductor modeling, node-shifted hexahedra should thus be used for the skin and skull compartments while we would not recommend deforming elements at the grey and white matter surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694865     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.890736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  24 in total

1.  Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Dannhauer; Benjamin Lanfer; Carsten H Wolters; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  EECoG-Comp: An Open Source Platform for Concurrent EEG/ECoG Comparisons-Applications to Connectivity Studies.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Pedro Antonio Valdés-Hernández; Deirel Paz-Linares; Jorge Bosch-Bayard; Naoya Oosugi; Misako Komatsu; Naotaka Fujii; Pedro Antonio Valdés-Sosa
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Accuracy and run-time comparison for different potential approaches and iterative solvers in finite element method based EEG source analysis.

Authors:  S Lew; C H Wolters; T Dierkes; C Röer; R S Macleod
Journal:  Appl Numer Math       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Danielle D Sliva; Myong-sun Choe; P Ellen Grant; Yoshio Okada; Carsten H Wolters; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  EEG source analysis of epileptiform activity using a 1 mm anisotropic hexahedra finite element head model.

Authors:  M Rullmann; A Anwander; M Dannhauer; S K Warfield; F H Duffy; C H Wolters
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Carsten H Wolters; Alfred Anwander; Scott Makeig; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The influence of sulcus width on simulated electric fields induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A M Janssen; S M Rampersad; F Lucka; B Lanfer; S Lew; U Aydin; C H Wolters; D F Stegeman; T F Oostendorp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Influence of unfused cranial bones on magnetoencephalography signals in human infants.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Matti S Hämäläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS.

Authors:  Toralf Neuling; Sven Wagner; Carsten H Wolters; Tino Zaehle; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.