Literature DB >> 17694826

Effect of central corneal thickness and radius of the corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured with the Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in healthy schoolchildren.

Nilgun Yildirim1, Afsun Sahin, Hikmet Basmak, Cengiz Bal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of central corneal thickness and radius of the corneal curvature on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using the Tono-Pen and a noncontact tonometer in healthy Turkish schoolchildren. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: IOP was measured with the Tono-Pen and a noncontact tonometer in 602 eyes of 602 healthy schoolchildren with a mean age of 10.1 +/- 1.6 years. Central corneal thickness was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter after all IOP determinations had been made. The effect of central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature, and sex on measured IOP was explored by linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: The mean central corneal thickness was found to be 564.92 +/- 32 microm. The mean IOP readings were 17.9 +/- 2 mm Hg using the Tono-Pen, and 16.7 +/- 2 mm Hg using a noncontact tonometer. The Tono-Pen measured IOP values slightly greater than the noncontact tonometer (P < .0001). A significant association between measured IOP and central corneal thickness was found with each device. The IOP increased 2.1 and 4.2 mm Hg with every 100-microm increase in central corneal thickness for the Tono-Pen and the noncontact tonometer, respectively. The dependence of IOP on central corneal thickness did not differ between boys and girls. There was a significant association between the Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer differences and central corneal thickness; the noncontact tonometer tended to overestimate IOP in eyes with thicker corneas.
CONCLUSIONS: The Tono-Pen readings appeared to be less affected by corneal thickness than those of the noncontact tonometer. The corneal radius of curvature had no significant effect on measured IOP with each device. Because the Tono-Pen was relatively easy to use and less affected by corneal thickness, it may be an alternative method for measuring IOP in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  9 in total

1.  Association of smoking and other risk factors with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy severity and corneal thickness.

Authors:  Xiaolin Zhang; Robert P Igo; Jeremy Fondran; V Vinod Mootha; Matt Oliva; Kristin Hammersmith; Alan Sugar; Jonathan H Lass; Sudha K Iyengar
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Central corneal thickness in Japanese children.

Authors:  Akiko Hikoya; Miho Sato; Kinnichi Tsuzuki; Yuka Maruyama Koide; Ryo Asaoka; Yoshihiro Hotta
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in Malay children.

Authors:  Fatemeh Heidary; Reza Gharebaghi; Wan Hazabbah Wan Hitam; Nyi Nyi Naing; Nadiah Wan-Arfah; Ismail Shatriah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Intraocular pressure and associations in children. The Gobi Desert Children Eye Study.

Authors:  Da Yong Yang; Kai Guo; Yan Wang; Yuan Yuan Guo; Xian Rong Yang; Xin Xia Jing; Hai Ke Guo; Yong Tao; Dan Zhu; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Correlation analysis between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in juveniles in Northern China: the Jinan city eye study.

Authors:  Wen Wei; Zhaoshan Fan; Lihua Wang; Zhiwei Li; Wanzhen Jiao; Yun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Distribution and associations of intraocular pressure in 7- and 12-year-old Chinese children: The Anyang Childhood Eye Study.

Authors:  Shuning Li; Shi-Ming Li; Xiao-Lei Wang; Meng-Tian Kang; Luo-Ru Liu; He Li; Shi-Fei Wei; An-Ran Ran; Siyan Zhan; Ravi Thomas; Ningli Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Comprehensive Meta-analysis on Intra Ocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness in Healthy Children.

Authors:  Majid Farvardin; Fatemeh Heidary; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Reza Gharebaghi; Mahmoud Jabbarvand Behrooz
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.429

8.  Normal intraocular pressure in Egyptian children and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Rezkallah Moussa; Rehab Rashad Kassem; Noha Ahmed Edris; Dalia Hamed Khalil
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.456

9.  Assessment of the central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in premature and full-term newborns.

Authors:  Isil Bahar Sayman Muslubas; Ayse Yesim Aydin Oral; Cemalettin Cabi; Sinan Caliskan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.