Literature DB >> 15920691

Laparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: a prospective comparative study.

J-L Dulucq1, P Wintringer, C Stabilini, L Solinas, J Perissat, A Mahajna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whereas laparoscopy for benign diseases provides clear advantages over traditional surgery, the benefits of laparoscopic gastric resection for malignant diseases are less clear. The objectives of this study were to compare prospectively the clinical outcomes between completely laparoscopic and open total and partial gastrectomies for malignant diseases and to assess whether laparoscopic gastrectomies obtain adequate margins and follow oncologic principles.
METHODS: Between April 1995 and March 2004, a prospective comparative study was performed comparing eight patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with 11 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy, and 16 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy with 17 who patients underwent open partial gastrectomy. Stage, extent of lymphadenectomy, and long-term follow-up were examined. The intraoperative and postoperative details of the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic group patients had fewer intraoperative complications while the operative time was similar to that of the open group. Both ambulation and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic groups than in the open groups. The short-term morbidity was lower in the laparoscopic groups and there were no cases of death, whereas one case of postoperative death occurred after an open total gastrectomy. There was no need to convert to open surgery. The number of lymph nodes obtained in the laparoscopic and open procedures was not significantly different. In addition, all resected margins were tumor free in the laparoscopic group, whereas tumor involvement was presented in the margin of one specimen in the open group.
CONCLUSIONS: The totally laparoscopic approach to total and partial gastrectomies had good results and was proven to be a feasible and safe procedure. In addition, the laparoscopic procedures are superior to open surgeries in terms of faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay, and better cosmetic outcomes. A totally laparoscopic approach for early and advanced gastric cancer can obtain adequate margins and follow oncologic principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15920691     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-2172-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Young-Woo Kim; Ho-Seong Han; Gary D Fleischer
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shinsuke Usui; Haruhiro Inoue; Tatsuya Yoshida; Norio Fukami; Shin-ei Kudo; Takehisa Iwai
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kyuzo Fujii; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy for early gastric carcinomas.

Authors:  S Kitano; Y Adachi; N Shiraishi; T Suematsu; T Bando
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Indication for and outcome of laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.

Authors:  N Shiraishi; Y Adachi; S Kitano; T Bandoh; T Katsuta; A Morimoto
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Role of laparoscopy in the management of stomach cancer.

Authors:  P M Goh; J B So
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-06

Review 8.  Advances in staging of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  M J Krasna
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for malignant disease.

Authors:  K J Weber; C D Reyes; M Gagner; C M Divino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  49 in total

1.  Comparative study of laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy in gastric cancer management.

Authors:  Giuseppe S Sica; Edoardo Iaculli; Livia Biancone; Sara Di Carlo; Rosa Scaramuzzo; Cristina Fiorani; Paolo Gentileschi; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703).

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai; Mitsuru Sasako; Haruhiko Fukuda; Kenichi Nakamura; Naoki Hiki; Makoto Saka; Hiroki Yamaue; Takaki Yoshikawa; Kazuyuki Kojima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Na Tang; Jun-Hong Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Andrea Coratti; Graziano Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy for T1 to T2 stage gastric cancer: a pilot study of three ports technique.

Authors:  Anwar Tawfik Amin; Adel Gabr; Hamza Abbas
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-02-07

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang Il Hwang; Hyung Ook Kim; Chang Hak Yoo; Jun Ho Shin; Byung Ho Son
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Xiong; Quentin M Nunes; Wei Huang; Chun-Lu Tan; Neng-Wen Ke; Si-Ming Xie; Xun Ran; Hao Zhang; Yong-Hua Chen; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Hamabe; Takeshi Omori; Koji Tanaka; Toshirou Nishida
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: early experience among the elderly.

Authors:  K K Singh; A Rohatgi; Iryna Rybinkina; Peter McCulloch; Satvinder Mudan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.