Literature DB >> 17690872

Head pitch affects muscle activity in the decerebrate cat hindlimb during walking.

Jinger S Gottschall1, T Richard Nichols.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to quantify the effects of head pitch on muscle activity patterns of the decerebrate cat hindlimb during walking. Five decerebrate cats walked at 0.7 m/s on a treadmill positioned level with the head pitch either parallel to the treadmill, 50% nose down or 50% nose up. We collected electromyography data from six hindlimb muscles. During level walking, after we manipulated head pitch, our results were surprisingly equivalent to the research on slope walking. For instance, muscle activity during level walking with a 50% head pitch nose down mimicked uphill walking. The muscle activity of the iliopsoas and semitendinosus significantly increased. Muscle activity during level walking with a 50% head pitch nose up mimicked downhill walking. Specifically, the biceps femoris and semimembranosus were inactive during the entire step. These alterations in muscle activity occurred within one step of altering head pitch but dissipated as level walking continued. In conclusion, the time course of muscle activity patterns due to modifications in head pitch is immediate and transitory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17690872      PMCID: PMC3064865          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1084-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  Vestibulospinal and reticulospinal neuronal activity during locomotion in the intact cat. I. Walking on a level surface.

Authors:  K Matsuyama; T Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Proprioceptive neck influences modify the information about tilt direction coded by the cerebellar anterior vermis.

Authors:  D Manzoni; P Andre; O Pompeiano
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  The role of cutaneous afferents from the distal hindlimb in the regulation of the step cycle of thalamic cats.

Authors:  J Duysens; K G Pearson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Forms of forward quadrupedal locomotion. III. A comparison of posture, hindlimb kinematics, and motor patterns for downslope and level walking.

Authors:  J L Smith; P Carlson-Kuhta; T V Trank
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Body position with respect to the head or body position in space is coded by lumbar interneurons.

Authors:  I Suzuki; S J Timerick; V J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Fast head tilt has only a minor effect on quick compensatory reactions during the regulation of stance and gait.

Authors:  V Dietz; G A Horstmann; W Berger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Unexpected motor patterns for hindlimb muscles during slope walking in the cat.

Authors:  J L Smith; P Carlson-Kuhta
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Gait initiation in bilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  O Sasaki; S Asawa; S Katsuno; S Usami; K Taguchi
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 9.  Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Duysens
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Vestibulospinal and reticulospinal neuronal activity during locomotion in the intact cat. II. Walking on an inclined plane.

Authors:  K Matsuyama; T Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  16 in total

1.  Electromyographic responses from the hindlimb muscles of the decerebrate cat to horizontal support surface perturbations.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Differences in movement mechanics, electromyographic, and motor cortex activity between accurate and nonaccurate stepping.

Authors:  Irina N Beloozerova; Bradley J Farrell; Mikhail G Sirota; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neuromuscular strategies for the transitions between level and hill surfaces during walking.

Authors:  Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Leg muscles that mediate stability: mechanics and control of two distal extensor muscles during obstacle negotiation in the guinea fowl.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Enhancing memory of stair height by the motor experience of stepping.

Authors:  Masahiro Shinya; Adrian Popescu; Caitlin Marchak; Brian Maraj; Keir Pearson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Byron Tang; Rani Pallegadda; Erin V L Vasudevan; Pablo Celnik; Amy Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Adaptation to slope in locomotor-trained spinal cats with intact and self-reinnervated lateral gastrocnemius and soleus muscles.

Authors:  Dwight Higgin; Alexander Krupka; Omid Haji Maghsoudi; Alexander N Klishko; T Richard Nichols; Mark A Lyle; Boris I Prilutsky; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Patterns of intermuscular inhibitory force feedback across cat hindlimbs suggest a flexible system for regulating whole limb mechanics.

Authors:  Mark A Lyle; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Distributed force feedback in the spinal cord and the regulation of limb mechanics.

Authors:  T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Thinking about walking: effects of conscious correction versus distraction on locomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.