Literature DB >> 17690867

Technical note: the "double eye" technique as a modification of autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects.

Philipp Niemeyer1, Peter C Kreuz, Matthias Steinwachs, Wolfgang Köstler, Alexander Mehlhorn, Nina Kraft, Norbert P Südkamp.   

Abstract

Retropatellar cartilage defects treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) are still associated with inferior clinical outcome compared to defects being located on the femoral condyles. This is partly because of the biomechanical characteristics of the patellofemoral section of the joint, in which, in contrast to the medial or lateral compartments of the knee joint, prejudicial shearing forces are dominant. The patellar ridge has a particularly important role in the reduction of these shearing forces. The double eye technique was developed as a modification of ACI with preserving the important patellar ridge for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects extending beyond the patellar ridge and involving the medial and lateral retropatellar facets. This technique provides for a separate reconstruction of the medial and the lateral facets by means of ACI, but the ridge region is preserved to maintain the original thickness of cartilage at this point. The present paper describes the "double eye" technique as a modification of autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACI) for treatment of cartilage defects of the patella, that involve both lateral and medial facets, and gives first clinical results of 11 patients. The average follow-up was 41.6 (+/-15.0) months, and the average age at diagnosis was 40.4 (+/-10.1) years. The Lysholm score, the subjective IKDC score, and the ICRS score were the instruments used to measure the outcome. This paper focuses on the introduction of the double eye technique with preservation of the patella ridge in the treatment of retropatellar cartilage lesion. Nevertheless, first clinical results of 11 patients are given, with an average Lysholm score of 75 (+/-14) points and an average subjective IKDC score of 60 (+/-14). Objective evaluation according to the criteria of the IKDC score showed very good or good treatment results in 9 of the 11 cases, with only 2 poor results. In conclusion, with the double eye modification presented in this paper, the potential for successful results in the treatment of combined cartilage defects of the medial and lateral facets of the patella is high; it takes into account the specific biomechanical properties of the patella ridge. The procedure needs further evaluation in clinical studies involving larger numbers of patients so that the indications can be determined more precisely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17690867     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0393-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of patellofemoral joint prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew A Amis; Wongwit Senavongse; Peter Darcy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanics of the knee joint in flexion under various quadriceps forces.

Authors:  W Mesfar; A Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee.

Authors:  P C Kreuz; M R Steinwachs; C Erggelet; S J Krause; G Konrad; M Uhl; N Südkamp
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology. 1. Functional anatomy of the patello-femoral joint.

Authors:  J Goodfellow; D S Hungerford; M Zindel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-08

5.  Anatomy and surface geometry of the patellofemoral joint in the axial plane.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; U Dürrenmatt; B Porcellini; W Rauschning
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-05

6.  A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders.

Authors:  F R Noyes; S D Barber; L A Mooar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability.

Authors:  Lars Peterson; Mats Brittberg; Illka Kiviranta; Evy Lundgren Akerlund; Anders Lindahl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee.

Authors:  L Peterson; T Minas; M Brittberg; A Nilsson; E Sjögren-Jansson; A Lindahl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger?

Authors:  Peter C Kreuz; Christoph Erggelet; Matthias R Steinwachs; Stefanie J Krause; Andreas Lahm; Philipp Niemeyer; Nadir Ghanem; Markus Uhl; Norbert Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the patella with periosteal transplantation.

Authors:  R Lorentzon; H Alfredson; C Hildingsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Patellar chondral defects: a review of a challenging entity.

Authors:  George Mouzopoulos; Carlo Borbon; Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  We do not have evidence based methods for the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee.

Authors:  Jan P Benthien; Manuela Schwaninger; Peter Behrens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prone position for minimal invasive or all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation at the patella.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Nico Sartory; Yuping Yang; Sven Feil; Hans H Paessler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Early osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Arendt; Massimo Berruto; Giuseppe Filardo; Mario Ronga; Stefano Zaffagnini; Jack Farr; Paolo Ferrua; Alberto Grassi; Vincenzo Condello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Current treatment for cartilage damage in the patellofemoral joint].

Authors:  M R Steinwachs; P C Kreuz; U Guhlke-Steinwachs; P Niemeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Cartilage Restoration of Patellofemoral Lesions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Renato Andrade; Joni Nunes; Betina B Hinckel; Jordan Gruskay; Sebastiano Vasta; Ricardo Bastos; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Andreas H Gomoll; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Chondral Injury in Patellofemoral Instability.

Authors:  Timothy Lording; Sébastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Periosteal Transplantation Combined with the Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) Technique in Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Stefan Schüttler; Nenad Andjelkov
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.634

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.