Literature DB >> 17689986

Timing of V1/V2 and V5+ activations during coherent motion of dots: an MEG study.

Esther Alonso Prieto1, Utako B Barnikol, Ernesto Palmero Soler, Kevin Dolan, Guido Hesselmann, Hartmut Mohlberg, Katrin Amunts, Karl Zilles, Michael Niedeggen, Peter A Tass.   

Abstract

In order to study the temporal activation course of visual areas V1 and V5 in response to a motion stimulus, a random dots kinematogram paradigm was applied to eight subjects while magnetic fields were recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Sources generating the registered magnetic fields were localized with Magnetic Field Tomography (MFT). Anatomical identification of cytoarchitectonically defined areas V1/V2 and V5 was achieved by means of probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps. We found that the areas V1/V2 and V5+ (V5 and other adjacent motion sensitive areas) exhibited two main activations peaks at 100-130 ms and at 140-200 ms after motion onset. The first peak found for V1/V2, which corresponds to the visual evoked field (VEF) M1, always preceded the peak found in V5+. Additionally, the V5+ peak was correlated significantly and positively with the second V1/V2 peak. This result supports the idea that the M1 component is generated not only by the visual area V1/V2 (as it is usually proposed), but also by V5+. It reflects a forward connection between both structures, and a feedback projection to V1/V2, which provokes a second activation in V1/V2 around 200 ms. This second V1/V2 activation (corresponding to motion VEF M2) appeared earlier than the second V5+ activation but both peaked simultaneously. This result supports the hypothesis that both areas also generate the M2 component, which reflects a feedback input from V5+ to V1/V2 and a crosstalk between both structures. Our study indicates that during visual motion analysis, V1/V2 and V5+ are activated repeatedly through forward and feedback connections and both contribute to m-VEFs M1 and M2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17689986     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Effects of spatial frequency on visual evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Aki Tsuruhara; Yuko Nagata; Masaya Suzuki; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual event-related potentials to biological motion stimuli in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anne Kröger; Anke Bletsch; Christoph Krick; Michael Siniatchkin; Tomasz A Jarczok; Christine M Freitag; Stephan Bender
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Visual feature-tolerance in the reading network.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Reno F Bowen; Lee M Perry; Alison M Kevan; Robert F Dougherty; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Spatiotemporal tuning of brain activity and force performance.

Authors:  Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  White matter maturation in visual and motor areas predicts the latency of visual activation in children.

Authors:  Colleen Dockstader; William Gaetz; Conrad Rockel; Donald J Mabbott
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  BA3b and BA1 activate in a serial fashion after median nerve stimulation: direct evidence from combining source analysis of evoked fields and cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps.

Authors:  Christos Papadelis; Simon B Eickhoff; Karl Zilles; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Prominent gamma band activity during visual motion perception in early-stage Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Nobushige Naito; Tetsu Hirosawa; Makoto Tsubomoto; Yoshiaki Miyagishi; Mitsuru Kikuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The timing of feedback to early visual cortex in the perception of long-range apparent motion.

Authors:  Michael Wibral; Christoph Bledowski; Axel Kohler; Wolf Singer; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Visual processing of biological motion in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an event related potential-study.

Authors:  Anne Kröger; Katharina Hof; Christoph Krick; Michael Siniatchkin; Tomasz Jarczok; Christine M Freitag; Stephan Bender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.