Literature DB >> 17689026

Customized dose prescription for permanent prostate brachytherapy: insights from a multicenter analysis of dosimetry outcomes.

Nelson N Stone1, Louis Potters, Brian J Davis, Jay P Ciezki, Michael J Zelefsky, Mack Roach, Paul A Fearn, Michael W Kattan, Richard G Stock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the biochemical control rate in patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy as a function of the biologically effective dose (BED) and risk group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six centers provided data on 3,928 permanent brachytherapy patients with postimplant dosimetry results. The mean prostate-specific antigen level was 8.9 ng/mL. (125)I was used in 2,293 (58%), (103)Pd in 1,635, and supplemental external beam radiotherapy in 882 (22.5%) patients. The patients were stratified into low- (n = 2,188), intermediate- (n = 1,188), and high- (n = 552) risk groups and into three BED groups of < 140 Gy (n = 524), 140-200 Gy (n = 2284), and >200 Gy (n = 1,115). Freedom from biochemical disease progression (biochemical freedom from failure [bFFF]) was determined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology and Phoenix definitions and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with factors compared using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: The 10-year prostate-specific antigen bFFF rate for the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology and Phoenix definitions was 79.2% and 70%, respectively. The corresponding bFFF rates for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 84.1% and 78.1%, 76.8% and 63.6%, and 64.4% and 58.2%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the three BED groups was 56.1% and 41.4%, 80% and 77.9%, and 91.1% and 82.9% (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the low-risk patients by dose group was 69.8% and 49.8%, 86% and 85.2%, and 88.1% and 88.3% for the low-, intermediate, and high-dose group, respectively (p <0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the intermediate-risk patients by dose group was 52.9% and 23.1%, 74.1% and 77.7%, and 94.3% and 88.8% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose group, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for high-risk patients by dose group was 19.2% and 41.7%, 61.8% and 53.2%, and 90% and 69.6% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose group, respectively (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that permanent brachytherapy dose prescriptions can be customized to risk status. In low-risk patients, achieving a BED of >or=140 Gy might be adequate for prostate-specific antigen control. However, high-risk disease might require a BED dose of >or=200 Gy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17689026     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  Toward adaptive stereotactic robotic brachytherapy for prostate cancer: demonstration of an adaptive workflow incorporating inverse planning and an MR stealth robot.

Authors:  J Adam Cunha; I-Chow Hsu; Jean Pouliot; Mack Roach Iii; Katsuto Shinohara; John Kurhanewicz; Galen Reed; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.442

2.  Canadian prostate brachytherapy in 2012.

Authors:  Mira Keyes; Juanita Crook; W James Morris; Gerard Morton; Tom Pickles; Nawaid Usmani; Eric Vigneault
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Results from the Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO) survey: Evaluation of dosimetric outcomes for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Gil'ad N Cohen; Walter R Bosch; Lisa Morikawa; Najma Khalid; Cheryl L Crozier; W Robert Lee; Anthony Zietman; Jean Owen; J Frank Wilson; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Real-time intraoperative computed tomography assessment of quality of permanent interstitial seed implantation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Mick Worman; Gilad N Cohen; Xin Pei; Marisa Kollmeier; Josh Yamada; Brett Cox; Zhigang Zhang; Eva Bieniek; Lawrence Dauer; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Comparing CTVs for permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  C A Oton; L Blanco; L F Oton; S Moral
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Transperineal prostate brachytherapy, using I-125 seed with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation, in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: study protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Kenta Miki; Takayoshi Kiba; Hiroshi Sasaki; Masahito Kido; Manabu Aoki; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Keiko Miyakoda; Takushi Dokiya; Hidetoshi Yamanaka; Masanori Fukushima; Shin Egawa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) as monotherapy for early stage prostate cancer in Italy: practice and outcome analysis in a series of 2237 patients from 11 institutions.

Authors:  Giovanni Fellin; Maria A Mirri; Luigi Santoro; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Claudio Divan; Salvatore Mussari; Francesco Ziglio; Beniamino La Face; Fernando Barbera; Michela Buglione; Laura Bandera; Barbara Ghedi; Nadia G Di Muzio; Andrea Losa; Paola Mangili; Luciano Nava; Renato Chiarlone; Nunzia Ciscognetti; Emilio Gastaldi; Federica Cattani; Ruggero Spoto; Andrea Vavassori; Francesca R Giglioli; Alessia Guarneri; Valentina Cerboneschi; Marcello Mignogna; Mauro Paoluzzi; Valentina Ravaglia; Costanza Chiumento; Stefania Clemente; Vincenzo Fusco; Roberto Santini; Marco Stefanacci; Francesco P Mangiacotti; Marco Martini; Tiziana Palloni; Giuseppe Schinaia; Grazia Lazzari; Giovanni Silvano; Stefano Magrini; Umberto Ricardi; Riccardo Santoni; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  The emerging role of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshioka; Ken Yoshida; Hideya Yamazaki; Norio Nonomura; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Risk factors for rectal bleeding associated with I-125 brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kosaku Harada; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Yoshitaka Saito; Soken Nakamoto; Hidemasa Kawamura; Masaru Wakatsuki; Toru Etsunaga; Yutaka Takezawa; Mikio Kobayashi; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.