Literature DB >> 17688714

The problem surgical colleague.

John G Mosley1.   

Abstract

The surgical profession, more than any other medical specialty, is constantly in the limelight. Frequently, concerns are expressed about our colleagues. The concerns may be personality clashes rather than failure in behaviour or performance. Most concerns can be addressed locally with support from the Royal College Invited Review Mechanism of the National Clinical Assessment Service. Unfortunately, if the concern is sufficiently serious or repetitive it may warrant referral to the General Medical Council (GMC) who alone has the right to withdraw a surgeon's medical registration. The surgeon will then be unable to work in the medical profession in this country. The procedures the the surgeon must undergo if referred to the GMC are stressful and protracted. Even if successful the surgeon will probably be expected to undergo a period of retraining that will prove difficult to arrange. New proposals to modify the GMC procedures will reduce the standard of proof to one of 'balance of probabilities'. The surgical profession should be accountable to its patients and colleagues. Will our Royal College rise to the challenge to establish itself as the bulwark of the surgical profession?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17688714      PMCID: PMC2048589          DOI: 10.1308/003588407X202209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

1.  Training the assessors for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures.

Authors:  P A McAvoy; P McCrorie; B Jolly; A B Ayers; J Cox; A D Howes; E B Macdonald; D J Slimmon; L Southgate
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace.

Authors:  L Southgate; J Cox; T David; D Hatch; A Howes; N Johnson; B Jolly; E Macdonald; P McAvoy; P McCrorie; J Turner
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: the development and implementation of tests of competence with examples from general practice.

Authors:  L Southgate; M Campbell; J Cox; J Foulkes; B Jolly; P McCrorie; P Tombleson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Developing standards, criteria, and thresholds to assess fitness to practise.

Authors:  Richard Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-28

5.  An assessment of an oral examination format for evaluating clinical competence in emergency medicine.

Authors:  D J Solomon; M A Reinhart; R G Bridgham; B S Munger; S Starnaman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  Maintaining standards in British and Canadian medicine: the developing role of the regulatory body.

Authors:  L Southgate; D Dauphinee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

Review 7.  The performance of doctors. I: Professionalism and self regulation in a changing world.

Authors:  D Irvine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-24

8.  All doctors are problem doctors.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-03-22

9.  The profession of medicine.

Authors:  K Calman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.