Literature DB >> 16439405

Developing standards, criteria, and thresholds to assess fitness to practise.

Richard Baker1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16439405      PMCID: PMC1352062          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7535.230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; Colin Sanderson; Andrew Hutchings; Simon Carter; Kirsten Larkin; Nick Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Jul 31-Aug 6       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

Authors:  M K Murphy; N A Black; D L Lamping; C M McKee; C F Sanderson; J Askham; T Marteau
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  A retrospective analysis of the GDC's performance against its newly-approved fitness to practise guidance.

Authors:  C T Gallagher; A I De Souza
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Criteria, competencies, and confidence tricks.

Authors:  Richard Wakeford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-28

3.  Assessing fitness to practise: revalidation is a long and winding road.

Authors:  Maurice Conlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-18

4.  Assessing fitness to practise: common sense approach to revalidation/accreditation.

Authors:  Anton E A Joseph
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-18

Review 5.  The problem surgical colleague.

Authors:  John G Mosley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.