Literature DB >> 17688309

Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses.

S Turan1, O M Turan, C Berg, D Moyano, A Bhide, S Bower, B Thilaganathan, U Gembruch, K Nicolaides, C Harman, A A Baschat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of non-stress test (NST), computerized fetal heart rate analysis (cCTG), biophysical profile scoring (BPS) and arterial and venous Doppler ultrasound investigation in the prediction of acid-base status in fetal growth restriction.
METHODS: Growth-restricted fetuses, defined by abdominal circumference < 5(th) percentile and umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index > 95(th) percentile, were tested by NST, cCTG, BPS, and UA, middle cerebral artery (MCA), ductus venosus (DV) and umbilical vein (UV) Doppler investigation. The short-term variation (STV) of the fetal heart rate was calculated using the Oxford Sonicaid 8002 cCTG system. Relationships between antenatal test results and cord artery pH < 7.20 were investigated, using correlation, parametric and non-parametric tests.
RESULTS: Fifty-six of 58 patients (96.6%) received complete assessment of all variables. All were delivered by pre-labor Cesarean section at a median gestational age of 30 + 6 weeks. The UA pulsatility index (PI) was negatively correlated with the cCTG STV (Pearson correlation - 0.29, P < 0.05). The DV PI was negatively correlated with the pH (Pearson correlation - 0.30, P < 0.02). The cCTG mean minute variation and pH were not significantly correlated (Pearson correlation 0.13, P = 0.34). UV pulsations identified the highest proportion of neonates with a low birth pH (9/17, 53%), the highest number of false positives among patients with an abnormal BPS, abnormal DV Doppler and a STV < 3.5 ms, and also stratified false negatives among patients with an equivocal or normal BPS. Abnormal DV Doppler correctly identified false positives among patients with an abnormal BPS. cCTG reduced the rate of an equivocal BPS from 16% to 7.1% when substituted for the traditional NST. Elevated DV Doppler index and umbilical venous pulsations predicted a low pH with 73% sensitivity and 90% specificity (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: In fetal growth restriction with placental insufficiency, venous Doppler investigation provides the best prediction of acid-base status. The cCTG performs best when combined with venous Doppler or as a substitute for the traditional NST in the BPS. Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17688309     DOI: 10.1002/uog.4101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  Intermediate Diastolic Velocity as a Parameter of Cardiac Dysfunction in Growth-Restricted Fetuses.

Authors:  Xiangna Tang; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Maynor Garcia; Homam Saker; Steven J Korzeniewski; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.587

2.  Predictive Value of Cerebroplacental Ratio in Detection of Perinatal Outcome in High-Risk Pregnancies.

Authors:  Rehana Najam; Sarika Gupta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-02-17

3.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance.

Authors:  Mats A Fagerquist; Ulf O Fagerquist; Anders Odén; Sture G Blomberg; Lars-Ake Mattsson
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  IUGR management: new perspectives.

Authors:  N Giuliano; M L Annunziata; S Tagliaferri; F G Esposito; O C M Imperato; M Campanile; M G Signorini; A Di Lieto
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2014-12-09

6.  Comparative analysis of 2-year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials.

Authors:  W Ganzevoort; J G Thornton; N Marlow; B Thilaganathan; B Arabin; F Prefumo; C Lees; H Wolf
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Cerebroplacental Ratio Versus Nonstress Test in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Nayak; Sweta Singh; Pruthwiraj Sethi; Tapas Kumar Som
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-30

8.  Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016).

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Jörg Dötsch; Kurt Hecher; Dietmar Schlembach; Dagmar Schmitz; Holger Stepan; Ulrich Gembruch
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Altered Cardiovascular Defense to Hypotensive Stress in the Chronically Hypoxic Fetus.

Authors:  Beth J Allison; Kirsty L Brain; Youguo Niu; Andrew D Kane; Emilio A Herrera; Avnesh S Thakor; Kimberley J Botting; Christine M Cross; Nozomi Itani; Caroline J Shaw; Katie L Skeffington; Chritian Beck; Dino A Giussani
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Altered autonomic control of heart rate variability in the chronically hypoxic fetus.

Authors:  C J Shaw; B J Allison; N Itani; K J Botting; Y Niu; C C Lees; D A Giussani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.