Literature DB >> 17688185

Pigeons' memory for sequences of light flashes when gap duration is an unreliable discriminative cue.

Dwayne Keough1, Angelo Santi, Patrick Van Rooyen.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained with a 1-sec dark and a 1-sec houselight-illuminated delay interval to discriminate between sequences of two and four flashes of light (feeder illumination). The sequences could be discriminated on the basis of the number of flashes, the number of gaps, or the duration of the gap between flashes. A choose-few bias was obtained at extended dark delays, but not at extended illuminated delays. Pigeons appeared to confuse long dark delays with the longer gap between flashes on few-sample trials. In Experiment 2, additional sample sequences were included that made gap duration an unreliable cue for discriminating between the few and many samples. A significant choose-many bias was obtained at extended dark delay intervals, but no biased forgetting was found at extended illuminated delays. The pigeons appeared to discriminate light flash sequences by relying on multiple temporal features of a sequence rather than using an event switch to count flashes. The biased-forgetting effects observed appear to be due to instructional ambiguity that results from the similarity of the delay interval to features of the flash sequences.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17688185     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  7 in total

Review 1.  Timing, memory for intervals, and memory for untimed stimuli: the role of instructional ambiguity.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons.

Authors:  Douglas S Grant
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Pigeons' memory for sequences of light flashes: reliance on temporal properties and evidence for delay interval/gap confusion.

Authors:  Angelo Santi; Jennifer Lellwitz; Stephen Gagne
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect.

Authors:  J G Fetterman; D MacEwen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice biases in delayed matching-to-sample duration with pigeons: Manipulations of ITI and delay illumination.

Authors:  R Kelly; M L Spetch
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-11

6.  Support for a theory of memory for event duration must distinguish between test-trial ambiguity and actual memory loss.

Authors:  T R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes.

Authors:  W H Meck; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.