Literature DB >> 17687012

External quality assessment of a DNA sequence-based scheme for epidemiological typing of Legionella pneumophila by an international network of laboratories.

Baharak Afshar1, Norman K Fry, William Bellamy, Anthony P Underwood, Timothy G Harrison.   

Abstract

We report the results of an international external quality assessment (EQA) program to assess the performance of laboratories in genotyping Legionella pneumophila isolates using the standard European Working Group for Legionella Infections sequence-based typing protocol. Three coded distributions of L. pneumophila isolates were sent to laboratories in 12, 14, and 20 countries, respectively. The data were returned by 11 of 16, 18 of 19, and 27 of 29 centers, respectively. Incomplete submission of data resulted in exclusion from certain aspects of the analyses. The number of centers achieving 100% score, for all loci tested, rose successively from 50% (5 of 10) for the first EQA distribution, to 56% (9 of 16) for the second EQA distribution, to 76% (19 of 25) for the third EQA distribution. A number of additional centers made only a few errors (one to three) in each distribution. Sequence data from the first two distributions were collected in flat text file format and using specially developed software, the sequence quality tool (SQT), in the third distribution. The SQT allows users to upload trace files in standard file formats, automates basecalling using phred and phrap software, contig assembly, trimming, and matching against a reference library. The program described here allow users an independent measure of sequence quality, and such schemes are vital in order to identify strengths and weakness in centers responsible for the generation of genotyping data in legionella outbreak investigation. The present study demonstrates that DNA sequence data can be highly reproducible but, when independently assessed, in practice frequently falls short of this goal. However, experience and training in the methodology results in increased performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17687012      PMCID: PMC2045376          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00898-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Consensus sequence-based scheme for epidemiological typing of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  Valeria Gaia; Norman K Fry; Baharak Afshar; P Christian Lück; Hélène Meugnier; Jerome Etienne; Raffaele Peduzzi; Timothy G Harrison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of three molecular methods used for subtyping of Legionella pneumophila strains isolated during an epidemic of Legionellosis in Rome.

Authors:  M Scaturro; M Losardo; G De Ponte; M L Ricci
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from cooling towers in Japan form a distinct genetic cluster.

Authors:  Junko Amemura-Maekawa; Fumiaki Kura; Bin Chang; Haruo Watanabe
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.955

4.  The public health implications of a sporadic case of culture-proven Legionnaires' disease.

Authors:  Megan Young; Helen Smith; Bruce Gray; Ben Huang; Jackie Barten; Chris Towner; Sandy Plowman; Baharak Afshar; Bahavak Afshar; Norman Fry; Barry Blair; John Savill; Bradley McCall
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.939

5.  Methodologic European external quality assurance for DNA sequencing: the EQUALseq program.

Authors:  Parviz Ahmad-Nejad; Alexandra Dorn-Beineke; Ulrike Pfeiffer; Joachim Brade; Wolf-Jochen Geilenkeuser; Simon Ramsden; Mario Pazzagli; Michael Neumaier
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  International quality assurance study for characterization of Streptococcus pyogenes.

Authors:  Shona Neal; Bernard Beall; Kim Ekelund; Birgitta Henriques-Normark; Aftab Jasir; Dwight Johnson; Edward Kaplan; Marguerite Lovgren; Ralf Rene Reinert; Androulla Efstratiou
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms.

Authors:  M C Maiden; J A Bygraves; E Feil; G Morelli; J E Russell; R Urwin; Q Zhang; J Zhou; K Zurth; D A Caugant; I M Feavers; M Achtman; B G Spratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Use of sequence-based typing for investigation of a case of nosocomial legionellosis.

Authors:  Sallene Wong; Kanti Pabbaraju; Veronica F Burk; George C Broukhanski; Julie Fox; Tom Louie; Manuel W Mah; Kathryn Bernard; Peter A G Tilley
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variable genetic element typing: a quick method for epidemiological subtyping of Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  K Pannier; K Heuner; C Lück
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Sequence verification of synthetic DNA by assembly of sequencing reads.

Authors:  Mandy L Wilson; Yizhi Cai; Regina Hanlon; Samantha Taylor; Bastien Chevreux; João C Setubal; Brett M Tyler; Jean Peccoud
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Letter to the editor: importance of a careful investigation to avoid attributing Legionnaires' disease cases to an incorrect source of infection.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Rota; Maria Scaturro; Maria Luisa Ricci
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.