Literature DB >> 17686805

Assessment of the anatomic regurgitant orifice in aortic regurgitation: a clinical magnetic resonance imaging study.

K Debl1, B Djavidani, S Buchner, N Heinicke, S Fredersdorf, J Haimerl, F Poschenrieder, S Feuerbach, G A J Riegger, A Luchner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine whether planimetry of the anatomic regurgitant orifice (ARO) in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is feasible and whether ARO by MRI correlates with the severity of AR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Planimetry of ARO by MRI was performed on a clinical magnetic resonance system (1.5 T Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions) in 45 patients and correlated with the regurgitant fraction (RgF) and regurgitant volume (RgV) determined by MRI phase velocity mapping (PVM; MRI-RgF, MRI-RgV, n = 45) and with invasively quantified AR by supravalvular aortography (n = 32) and RgF upon cardiac catheterisation (CATH-RgF, n = 15). Determination of ARO was possible in 98% (44/45) of the patients with adequate image quality. MRI-RgF and CATH-RgF were modestly correlated (n = 15, r = 0.71, p<0.01). ARO was closely correlated with MRI-RgF (n = 44, r = 0.88, p<0.001) and was modestly correlated with CATH-RgF (n = 14, r = 0.66, p = 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity of ARO to detect moderately severe and severe aortic regurgitation (defined as MRI-RgF > or =40%) were 96% and 95% at a threshold of 0.28 cm2 (AUC = 0.99). Of note, sensitivity and specificity of ARO to detect moderately severe and severe AR at catheterisation (defined as CATH-RgF > or =40% or supravalvular aortography > or =3+) were 90% and 91% at a similar threshold of 0.28 cm2 (AUC = 0.95). Lastly, sensitivity and specificity of ARO to detect severe aortic regurgitation (defined as MRI-RgF > or =50% and/or regurgitant volume > or =60 ml) were 83% and 97% at a threshold of 0.48 cm2 (AUC = 0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Visualisation and planimetry of the ARO in patients with AR are feasible by MRI. There is a strong correlation of ARO with RgV and RgF assessed by PVM and with invasively graded AR at catheterisation. Therefore, determination of ARO by MRI is a new non-invasive measure for assessing the severity of AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17686805     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.108720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  7 in total

1.  Quantitation of mitral regurgitation after percutaneous MitraClip repair: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian Hamilton-Craig; Wendy Strugnell; Niranjan Gaikwad; Matthew Ischenko; Vicki Speranza; Jonathan Chan; Johanne Neill; David Platts; Gregory M Scalia; Darryl J Burstow; Darren L Walters
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

Review 2.  Aortic valvular imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: seeking for comprehensiveness.

Authors:  Gianluca De Rubeis; Nicola Galea; Isabella Ceravolo; Gian Marco Dacquino; Iacopo Carbone; Carlo Catalano; Marco Francone
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Current Management of Patients with Severe Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Charles Nadeau-Routhier; Ons Marsit; Jonathan Beaudoin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

4.  Dilatation of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Kurt Debl; Behrus Djavidani; Stefan Buchner; Florian Poschenrieder; Franz-Xaver Schmid; Reinhard Kobuch; Stefan Feuerbach; Günter Riegger; Andreas Luchner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Comprehensive assessment of the severity and mechanism of aortic regurgitation using multidetector CT and MR.

Authors:  Céline Goffinet; Valérie Kersten; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Jean-Benoit le Polain de Waroux; David Vancraeynest; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Juan C Lopez-Mattei; Dipan J Shah
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

Review 7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Angela Morello; Eli V Gelfand
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.