Literature DB >> 17686477

Predictors of ongoing pregnancy after single-embryo transfer following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Marieke F G Verberg1, Marinus J C Eijkemans2, Nicholas S Macklon3, Esther M E W Heijnen3, Bart C J M Fauser3, Frank J Broekmans3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for the prediction of ongoing pregnancy after single-embryo transfer (SET) following mild stimulation for IVF in women less than 38 years of age.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Two fertility centers in tertiary referral university hospitals. PATIENT(S): A total of 152 women with an elective SET following mild ovarian stimulation (cycle day 5 start of 150 IU/day recombinant FSH and late follicular phase GnRH antagonist cotreatment). INTERVENTION(S): Database analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy. RESULT(S): The ongoing pregnancy rate per elective SET was 28% (42 of 152). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index, the total gonadotrophin dose needed, and number of oocytes retrieved were negatively correlated whereas the availability of a top-quality embryo was positively correlated with ongoing pregnancy. The predictive ability of the model assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68. At a probability cut-off level of 0.20 the model showed a sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSION(S): The developed prediction model for ongoing pregnancy provides an evidence-based strategy for guidance under which conditions SET may be performed. After external validation, application of the model may help to improve overall singleton pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17686477     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  Biomarkers of human oocyte developmental competence expressed in cumulus cells before ICSI: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mourad Assidi; Markus Montag; Katrin Van der Ven; Marc-André Sirard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Milder is better? Advantages and disadvantages of "mild" ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Simona Casano; Francesca Salvagno; Luisa Delle Piane
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Rosalie Cabry-Goubet; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Aviva Devaux; Naima Belhadri-Mansouri; Henri Copin; Moncef Benkhalifa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 4.  Should mild stimulation be the order of the day?

Authors:  Nalini Mahajan
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Prediction models in in vitro fertilization; where are we? A mini review.

Authors:  Laura van Loendersloot; S Repping; P M M Bossuyt; F van der Veen; M van Wely
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 10.479

6.  Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate concentration is not a predictive factor in IVF outcomes before the first cycle of GnRH agonist administration in women with normal ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Michał Kunicki; Krzysztof Łukaszuk; Grzegorz Jakiel; Joanna Liss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Internal validation and comparison of predictive models to determine success rate of infertility treatments: a retrospective study of 2485 cycles.

Authors:  Ameneh Mehrjerd; Hassan Rezaei; Saeid Eslami; Mariam Begum Ratna; Nayyere Khadem Ghaebi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Nomogram prediction for the prediction of clinical pregnancy in Freeze-thawed Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Xiaolong Wang; Yuming Zhang; Haiou Lu; Yuexin Yu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.105

9.  The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation.

Authors:  Miro Šimun Alebić; Nataša Stojanović; Marta Zuvić-Butorac
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 3.257

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.