Literature DB >> 17685678

Quantifying plyometric intensity via rate of force development, knee joint, and ground reaction forces.

Randall L Jensen1, William P Ebben.   

Abstract

Because the intensity of plyometric exercises usually is based simply upon anecdotal recommendations rather than empirical evidence, this study sought to quantify a variety of these exercises based on forces placed upon the knee. Six National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes who routinely trained with plyometric exercises performed depth jumps from 46 and 61 cm, a pike jump, tuck jump, single-leg jump, countermovement jump, squat jump, and a squat jump holding dumbbells equal to 30% of 1 repetition maximum (RM). Ground reaction forces obtained via an AMTI force plate and video analysis of markers placed on the left hip, knee, lateral malleolus, and fifth metatarsal were used to estimate rate of eccentric force development (E-RFD), peak ground reaction forces (GRF), ground reaction forces relative to body weight (GRF/BW), knee joint reaction forces (K-JRF), and knee joint reaction forces relative to body weight (K-JRF/BW) for each plyometric exercise. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance indicated that E-RFD, K-JRF, and K-JRF/BW were different across the conditions (p < 0.05), but peak GRF and GRF/BW were not (p > 0.05). Results indicate that there are quantitative differences between plyometric exercises in the rate of force development during landing and the forces placed on the knee, though peak GRF forces associated with landing may not differ.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17685678     DOI: 10.1519/R-18735.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  11 in total

1.  CURRENT CONCEPTS OF PLYOMETRIC EXERCISE.

Authors:  George Davies; Bryan L Riemann; Robert Manske
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  Current Methodologies and Implications of Phase Identification of the Vertical Jump: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Neale Eagles; Mark Gregory Leigh Sayers; Matthew Bousson; Dale Ingham Lovell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Ballistic exercise as a pre-activation stimulus: a review of the literature and practical applications.

Authors:  Sean J Maloney; Anthony N Turner; Iain M Fletcher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Programming Plyometric-Jump Training in Soccer: A Review.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Jason Moran; Jon L Oliver; Jason S Pedley; Rhodri S Lloyd; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 6.  Recommendations for Movement Re-training After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Impact forces of plyometric exercises performed on land and in water.

Authors:  Orna A Donoghue; Hirofumi Shimojo; Hideki Takagi
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Recommendations for Plyometric Training after ACL Reconstruction - A Clinical Commentary.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe; Francesco Della Villa
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  The Kinetic Specificity of Plyometric Training: Verbal Cues Revisited.

Authors:  Talin Louder; Megan Bressel; Eadric Bressel
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Effects of conditioning hops on drop jump and sprint performance: a randomized crossover pilot study in elite athletes.

Authors:  Jakob Kümmel; Julian Bergmann; Olaf Prieske; Andreas Kramer; Urs Granacher; Markus Gruber
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.