BACKGROUND: The current study examined changes in multiple domains of cognitive functioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) candidates tested pretransplantation, 6 months posttransplantation, and 12 months posttransplantation. METHODS: Using a sequential longitudinal design, 476 patients were randomized to be tested at all 3 time points, at 6 and 12 months posttransplantation, or at only 12 months posttransplantation. Participants completed a comprehensive battery of neuropsychologic tests that indexed memory, psychomotor speed, attention, and executive functioning, and provided a total neuropsychologic performance score (TNP). RESULTS: The results indicate that performance on cognitive abilities, except for attention, significantly improved across the 1-year follow-up period after HSCT. Performance on the TNP and all cognitive domains was superior or equal to population normative values by the 12-month measurement point. The results also indicate that repeated exposure to tests led to better performance on motor speed and the TNP and that attrition influenced the TNP, such that those who remained in the longitudinal sample exhibited greater longitudinal improvement in scores as compared with patients who left the sample. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study suggest that although patients undergoing HSCT experience cognitive deficits during the period just before transplantation, cognitive functioning returns to normative values within a year after transplantation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The current study examined changes in multiple domains of cognitive functioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) candidates tested pretransplantation, 6 months posttransplantation, and 12 months posttransplantation. METHODS: Using a sequential longitudinal design, 476 patients were randomized to be tested at all 3 time points, at 6 and 12 months posttransplantation, or at only 12 months posttransplantation. Participants completed a comprehensive battery of neuropsychologic tests that indexed memory, psychomotor speed, attention, and executive functioning, and provided a total neuropsychologic performance score (TNP). RESULTS: The results indicate that performance on cognitive abilities, except for attention, significantly improved across the 1-year follow-up period after HSCT. Performance on the TNP and all cognitive domains was superior or equal to population normative values by the 12-month measurement point. The results also indicate that repeated exposure to tests led to better performance on motor speed and the TNP and that attrition influenced the TNP, such that those who remained in the longitudinal sample exhibited greater longitudinal improvement in scores as compared with patients who left the sample. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study suggest that although patients undergoing HSCT experience cognitive deficits during the period just before transplantation, cognitive functioning returns to normative values within a year after transplantation.
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Brent Small; Sheri Hartman; Jamie Franzen; Shannon Millay; Kristin Phillips; Paul B Jacobsen; Margaret Booth-Jones; Joseph Pidala Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Linda J Burns; Beatrice Abbetti; Stacie D Arnold; Jeffrey Bender; Susan Doughtie; Areej El-Jawahiri; Gloria Gee; Theresa Hahn; Mary M Horowitz; Shirley Johnson; Mark Juckett; Lakshmanan Krishnamurit; Susan Kullberg; C Fred LeMaistre; Alison Loren; Navneet S Majhail; Elizabeth A Murphy; Doug Rizzo; Alva Roche-Green; Wael Saber; Barry A Schatz; Kim Schmit-Pokorny; Bronwen E Shaw; Karen L Syrjala; D Kathryn Tierney; Christina Ullrich; David J Vanness; William A Wood; Ellen M Denzen Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: James C Root; Claudine Campbell; Xiomara Rocha-Cadman; Nicole Kasven-Gonzalez; Molly Maloy; Jessica Flynn; Sean M Devlin; Ann A Jakubowski Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Sheri J Hartman; Sandahl H Nelson; Emily Myers; Loki Natarajan; Dorothy D Sears; Barton W Palmer; Lauren S Weiner; Barbara A Parker; Ruth E Patterson Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Samantha J Mayo; Hans A Messner; Sean B Rourke; Doris Howell; J Charles Victor; Jeffrey H Lipton; J Kuruvilla; Vikas Gutpa; Dennis Dong Hwan Kim; Fotios V Michelis; Kelly Metcalfe Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: D D Correa; J C Root; R Baser; D Moore; K K Peck; E Lis; T B Shore; H T Thaler; A Jakubowski; N Relkin Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: D D Correa; Y Wang; J D West; K K Peck; J C Root; R E Baser; H T Thaler; T B Shore; A Jakubowski; A J Saykin; N Relkin Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.978