Literature DB >> 17684341

Fluid mechanics and crossfiltration in hollow-fiber hemodialyzers.

Claudio Ronco1.   

Abstract

The efficiency of a hemodialyzer is largely dependent on its ability to facilitate diffusion between blood and dialysis solution. The diffusion process can be impaired if there is a mismatch between blood and dialysate flow distribution in the dialyzer. For this reason it is important that average and regional blood and dialysate flow velocities do not differ significantly. Single-fiber flow velocity should be similar in the center and the periphery of the bundle. Similarly, dialysate flow in the central region of the dialyzer and in the peripheral areas should be similar. In this way the best blood-to-dialysate flow countercurrent configuration is obtained, and the diffusive process is optimized. Unfortunately this optimal situation is hard to achieve, and frequently a significant blood-to-dialysate flow mismatch may occur in hollow-fiber hemodialyzers either due to uneven blood flow distribution or to a dialysate channeling phenomenon external to the fiber bundle. Attempts to optimize flows has been made in the blood compartment designing specific blood ports while, in the dialysate, different options have been proposed such as space yarns (spacing filaments preventing contact between fibers) or the moiré structure (waved shape of fibers to prevent contact between adjacent fibers). Furthermore, the process of transmembrane crossfiltration along the length of the dialyzer can be very different in quantity and direction, thus interfering significantly with the diffusion process. In particular, maximal rates of direct filtration (blood to dialysate) are achieved in the proximal part of the dialyzer, while in the distal part ultrafiltration is minimal and it can also change direction producing significant amounts of backfiltration.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17684341     DOI: 10.1159/000107233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrib Nephrol        ISSN: 0302-5144            Impact factor:   1.580


  5 in total

1.  Preliminary Diffusive Clearance of Silicon Nanopore Membranes in a Parallel Plate Configuration for Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Steven Kim; James Heller; Zohora Iqbal; Rishi Kant; Eun Jung Kim; Jeremy Durack; Maythem Saeed; Loi Do; Steven Hetts; Mark Wilson; Paul Brakeman; William H Fissell; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Assessment of the association between increasing membrane pore size and endotoxin permeability using a novel experimental dialysis simulation set-up.

Authors:  Eva Schepers; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot; Michael Hulko; Adriana Boschetti-de-Fierro; Werner Beck; Bernd Krause; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 3.  Artificial Kidney Engineering: The Development of Dialysis Membranes for Blood Purification.

Authors:  Yu-Shuo Tang; Yu-Cheng Tsai; Tzen-Wen Chen; Szu-Yuan Li
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 4.  The ultrafiltration coefficient: this old 'grand inconnu' in dialysis.

Authors:  Alain Ficheux; Claudio Ronco; Philippe Brunet; Àngel Argilés
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 5.  Expanded haemodialysis: from operational mechanism to clinical results.

Authors:  Claudio Ronco; Nicola Marchionna; Alessandra Brendolan; Mauro Neri; Anna Lorenzin; Armando J Martínez Rueda
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.992

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.