Literature DB >> 17682103

Development of resistance in wild-type and hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains exposed to clinical pharmacokinetic profiles of meropenem and ceftazidime simulated in vitro.

Beate Henrichfreise1, Irith Wiegand, Ingeborg Luhmer-Becker, Bernd Wiedemann.   

Abstract

In this study we investigated the interplay of antibiotic pharmacokinetic profiles and the development of mutation-mediated resistance in wild-type and hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. We used in vitro models simulating profiles of the commonly used therapeutic drugs meropenem and ceftazidime, two agents with high levels of antipseudomonal activity said to have different potentials for stimulating resistance development. During ceftazidime treatment of the wild-type strain (PAO1), fully resistant mutants overproducing AmpC were selected rapidly and they completely replaced wild-type cells in the population. During treatment with meropenem, mutants of PAO1 were not selected as rapidly and showed only intermediate resistance due to the loss of OprD. These mutants also replaced the parent strain in the population. During the treatment of the mutator P. aeruginosa strain with meropenem, the slowly selected mutants did not accumulate several resistance mechanisms but only lost OprD and did not completely replace the parent strain in the population. Our results indicate that the commonly used dosing regimens for meropenem and ceftazidime cannot avoid the selection of mutants of wild-type and hypermutable P. aeruginosa strains. For the treatment outcome, including the prevention of resistance development, it would be beneficial for the antibiotic concentration to remain above the mutant prevention concentration for a longer period of time than it does in present regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17682103      PMCID: PMC2043282          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00160-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  35 in total

1.  Optimization of meropenem minimum concentration/MIC ratio to suppress in vitro resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Vincent H Tam; Amy N Schilling; Shadi Neshat; Keith Poole; David A Melnick; Elizabeth A Coyle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Mathematical corrections for bacterial loss in pharmacodynamic in vitro dilution models.

Authors:  S Keil; B Wiedemann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during continuous and intermittent infusion of ceftazidime in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  J W Mouton; J G den Hollander
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime.

Authors:  R Lüthy; J Blaser; A Bonetti; H Simmen; R Wise; W Siegenthaler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents.

Authors:  Y Carmeli; N Troillet; G M Eliopoulos; M H Samore
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Evaluation by monte carlo simulation of the pharmacokinetics of two doses of meropenem administered intermittently or as a continuous infusion in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Krueger; Jurgen Bulitta; Martina Kinzig-Schippers; Cornelia Landersdorfer; Ulrike Holzgrabe; Kurt G Naber; George L Drusano; Fritz Sörgel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Efficacy and potential for resistance selection of antipseudomonal treatments in a mouse model of lung infection by hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  M D Maciá; N Borrell; M Segura; C Gómez; J L Pérez; A Oliver
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Nosocomial infections in adult intensive-care units.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Role of AmpD, OprF and penicillin-binding proteins in beta-lactam resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Simona Bratu; David Landman; Jyoti Gupta; John Quale
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of meropenem using an in-vitro model to simulate once, twice and three times daily dosing in humans.

Authors:  K E Bowker; H A Holt; R J Lewis; D S Reeves; A P MacGowan
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Xian-Zhi Li; Patrick Plésiat; Hiroshi Nikaido
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Adaptive and mutational resistance: role of porins and efflux pumps in drug resistance.

Authors:  Lucía Fernández; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Development and qualification of a pharmacodynamic model for the pronounced inoculum effect of ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Neang S Ly; Jenny C Yang; Alan Forrest; William J Jusko; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  [Therapeutic drug monitoring and individual dosing of antibiotics during sepsis : Modern or just "trendy"?]

Authors:  A Brinkmann; A C Röhr; A Köberer; T Fuchs; J Preisenberger; W A Krüger; O R Frey
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Phages limit the evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance in experimental microcosms.

Authors:  Quan-Guo Zhang; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Fighting microbial drug resistance: a primer on the role of evolutionary biology in public health.

Authors:  Gabriel G Perron; R Fredrik Inglis; Pleuni S Pennings; Sarah Cobey
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Development of Antibiotic Resistance during Simulated Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chemostats.

Authors:  Yanfang Feng; Caspar J Hodiamont; Reinier M van Hest; Stanley Brul; Constance Schultsz; Benno H Ter Kuile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Saudi Thoracic Society guidelines for diagnosis and management of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

Authors:  Hamdan Al-Jahdali; Abdullah Alshimemeri; Abdullah Mobeireek; Amr S Albanna; Nehad N Al Shirawi; Siraj Wali; Khaled Alkattan; Abdulrahman A Alrajhi; Khalid Mobaireek; Hassan S Alorainy; Mohamed S Al-Hajjaj; Anne B Chang; Stefano Aliberti
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.219

9.  Absorption Kinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Ceftazidime in Hypoperfused Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ebihara; Shinji Oshima; Mitsuyoshi Okita; Sayumi Shiina; Akio Negishi; Kousuke Ohara; Shigeru Ohshima; Hiroyuki Iwasaki; Akira Yoneyama; Eiji Kitazumi; Daisuke Kobayashi
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2014-11-18

10.  Exposure to phages has little impact on the evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance on drug concentration gradients.

Authors:  Quan-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.