Literature DB >> 17681803

Total joint replacement after glucosamine sulphate treatment in knee osteoarthritis: results of a mean 8-year observation of patients from two previous 3-year, randomised, placebo-controlled trials.

O Bruyere1, K Pavelka, L C Rovati, J Gatterová, G Giacovelli, M Olejarová, R Deroisy, J Y Reginster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of Total Joint Replacement (TJR) during the long-term follow-up of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) formerly receiving treatment with glucosamine sulphate or placebo.
METHODS: Knee OA patients participating in two previous randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3-year trials of glucosamine sulphate and receiving treatment for at least 12 months, were systematically contacted to participate in a long-term follow-up retrospective assessment of the incidence of total knee replacement.
RESULTS: Out of 340 patients with at least 12 months of treatment, 275 (i.e., 81%) could be retrieved and interviewed for the present evaluation: 131 formerly on placebo and 144 on glucosamine sulphate. There were no differences in baseline disease characteristics between groups or with the patients lost to follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was approximately 5 years after trial termination and treatment discontinuation, making up a total of 2178 patient-years of observation (including treatment and follow-up). Total knee replacement had occurred in over twice as many patients from the placebo group, 19/131 (14.5%), than in those formerly receiving glucosamine sulphate, 9/144 (6.3%) (P=0.024, chi-square test), with a Relative Risk that was therefore 0.43 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.92), i.e., a 57% decrease compared with placebo. The Kaplan Meier/Log-Rank test survival analysis confirmed a significantly decreased (P=0.026) cumulative incidence of total knee replacements in patients who had received glucosamine sulphate. A pharmacoeconomic analysis in a subgroup of subjects suggested that patients formerly on glucosamine sulphate had recurred to less symptomatic medications and use of other health resources than those from the placebo group during the last year of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of knee OA with glucosamine sulphate for at least 12 months and up to 3 years may prevent TJR in an average follow-up of 5 years after drug discontinuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17681803     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  36 in total

1.  The glucosamine debate: is it better than placebo?

Authors:  Richard Wigley
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.473

2.  Comparison of radiographic joint space width and magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of knee replacement: A longitudinal case-control study from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Robert Boudreau; Zhijie Wang; Michael J Hannon; Jeff Duryea; Wolfgang Wirth; Sebastian Cotofana; Ali Guermazi; Frank Roemer; Michael Nevitt; Markus R John; Christoph Ladel; Leena Sharma; David J Hunter; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Chondroitin and glucosamine in the management of osteoarthritis: an update.

Authors:  Yves Henrotin; Cécile Lambert
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 5.  Biomarkers for osteoarthritis: current position and steps towards further validation.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Michael Nevitt; Elena Losina; Virginia Kraus
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 6.  Nutraceuticals in the management of osteoarthritis : a critical review.

Authors:  Ryan L Ragle; Allen D Sawitzke
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  PURLs: arthritis pain? These supplements provide little relief.

Authors:  James J Stevermer; Nina V Rogers
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 8.  Naturally derived biomaterials for addressing inflammation in tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hortensius; Brendan Ac Harley
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-05-04

9.  Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the femoral head: associated imaging findings and predictors of clinical progression.

Authors:  Lauren A Hackney; Min Hee Lee; Gabby B Joseph; Thomas P Vail; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Functional articular cartilage repair: here, near, or is the best approach not yet clear?

Authors:  Simon C Mastbergen; Daniël B F Saris; Floris P J G Lafeber
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 20.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.