Literature DB >> 17681639

A comparison of a fiberoptic stylet and a bougie as adjuncts to direct laryngoscopy in a manikin-simulated difficult airway.

George Kovacs1, J Adam Law, Chris McCrossin, Mark Vu, Derek Leblanc, Jun Gao.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We compare the effectiveness of an endotracheal tube introducer ("bougie") with a new fiberoptic stylet as an adjunct to direct laryngoscopy in facilitating simulated difficult tracheal intubation in a manikin.
METHODS: Inexperienced laryngoscopists were recruited for this randomized, crossover study. After brief training, participants were randomized to first use either the bougie or fiberoptic stylet as an adjunct to direct laryngoscopy for attempted tracheal intubation of a manikin presenting a fixed, simulated, Cormack-Lehane grade IIIA view. Two attempts at tracheal intubation were allowed, each limited to 60 seconds. The participant then crossed over and used the other device. The same procedure was then repeated on a second manikin presenting a simulated Cormack-Lehane grade IIIB view. Primary outcomes were time to tracheal intubation and successful endotracheal tube placement.
RESULTS: One hundred three study participants performed a total of 533 tracheal intubations for evaluation. For the Cormack-Lehane grade IIIA view, correct placement of the endotracheal tube was achieved in 101 (98%) of the fiberoptic stylet-facilitated and all 103 (100%) of the bougie-facilitated tracheal intubations. The time to successful tracheal intubation was similar for both devices (difference in mean time 1.8 seconds; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.5 to 6.1 seconds). In the Cormack-Lehane grade IIIB view manikin, use of the fiberoptic stylet significantly increased success rate (fiberoptic stylet 98% versus bougie 9%), and a trend was observed toward a decrease in the mean time required for successful tracheal intubation compared to the bougie (fiberoptic stylet 31.0 seconds versus bougie 45.6 seconds; difference in mean time -14.6 seconds; 95% CI -31.4 to 2.3 seconds).
CONCLUSION: In a manikin model, with inexperienced clinicians, both the bougie and the fiberoptic stylet were effective in facilitating tracheal intubation of a simulated Cormack-Lehane grade IIIA view. For a Cormack-Lehane IIIB view, the fiberoptic stylet was significantly more effective than the bougie in facilitating tracheal intubation. Because a manikin model eliminates some of the barriers to use of fiberoptics in patients, further validation of fiberoptic stylet use is required in human subjects with normal and difficult airways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17681639     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  4 in total

1.  Benefits of using an endotracheal tube introducer as an adjunct to a Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation performed by inexperienced doctors during mechanical CPR: A randomized prospective crossover study.

Authors:  Hüseyin Cahit Halhalli; Asım Enes Özbek; Emrah Çelİk; Yavuz Yİğİt; Serkan Yilmaz; Müge Çardak
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2019

2.  Performance of emergency physicians utilizing a video-assisted semi-rigid fiberoptic stylet for intubation of a difficult airway in a high-fidelity simulated patient: a pilot study.

Authors:  Derek R Cooney; Norma L Cooney; Harry Wallus; Susan Wojcik
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-29

3.  Comparison of the airway access skills of prehospital staff in moving and stationary ambulance simulation: A randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Onur Karaca; Basak Bayram; Nese Colak Oray; Asli Acerer; Zeynep Sofuoglu
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-23

4.  Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Kurt Ruetzler; Jacek Smereka; Cristian Abelairas-Gomez; Michael Frass; Marek Dabrowski; Szymon Bialka; Hanna Misiolek; Tadeusz Plusa; Oliver Robak; Olga Aniolek; Jerzy Robert Ladny; Damian Gorczyca; Sanchit Ahuja; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.