Literature DB >> 17679726

Shifting breast cancer trends in the United States.

William F Anderson1, Anne S Reiner, Rayna K Matsuno, Ruth M Pfeiffer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: United States breast cancer incidence rates declined during the years 1999 to 2003, and then reached a plateau. These recent trends are impressive and may indicate an end to decades of increasing incidence.
METHODS: To put emerging incidence trends into a broader context, we examined age incidence patterns (frequency and rates) during five decades. We used age density plots, two-component mixture models, and age-period-cohort (APC) models to analyze changes in the United States breast cancer population over time.
RESULTS: The National Cancer Institute's Connecticut Historical Database and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program collected 600,000+ in situ and invasive female breast cancers during the years 1950 to 2003. Before widespread screening mammography in the early 1980s, breast cancer age-at-onset distributions were bimodal, with dominant peak frequency (or mode) near age 50 years and smaller mode near age 70 years. With widespread screening mammography, bimodal age distributions shifted to predominant older ages at diagnosis. From 2000 to 2003, the bimodal age distribution returned to dominant younger ages at onset, similar to patterns before mammography screening. APC models confirmed statistically significant calendar-period (screening) effects before and after 1983 to 1987.
CONCLUSION: Breast cancer in the general United States population has a bimodal age at onset distribution, with modal ages near 50 and 70 years. Amid a background of previously increasing and recently decreasing incidence rates, breast cancer populations shifted from younger to older ages at diagnosis, and then back again. These dynamic fluctuations between early-onset and late-onset breast cancer types probably reflect a complex interaction between age-related biologic, risk factor, and screening phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17679726     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  22 in total

1.  Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover.

Authors:  Christina A Clarke; Theresa H M Keegan; Juan Yang; David J Press; Allison W Kurian; Anish H Patel; James V Lacey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Natasha K Stout; Dennis G Fryback; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Benjamin A Herman; Lucy G Hannah; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Qualitative age interactions in breast cancer studies: mind the gap.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ismail Jatoi; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Genetic polymorphisms of multiple DNA repair pathways impact age at diagnosis and TP53 mutations in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tasha R Smith; Wen Liu-Mares; Beth O Van Emburgh; Edward A Levine; Glenn O Allen; Jeff W Hill; Isildinha M Reis; Laura A Kresty; Mark D Pegram; Mark S Miller; Jennifer J Hu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  On the convexity of ROC curves estimated from radiological test results.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Trends in distant-stage breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer incidence rates from 1992 to 2004: potential influences of screening and hormonal factors.

Authors:  Jean A McDougall; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 7.  How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more?

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program.

Authors:  Joan E Cunningham; Christine A Walters; Elizabeth G Hill; Marvella E Ford; Tiffany Barker-Elamin; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Active smoking and risk of Luminal and Basal-like breast cancer subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Eboneé N Butler; Chiu-Kit Tse; Mary Elizabeth Bell; Kathleen Conway; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast in the United States (1977 to 2006): a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Bassam Ghabach; William F Anderson; Rochelle E Curtis; Mark M Huycke; Jackie A Lavigne; Graça M Dores
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.