William F Anderson1, Anne S Reiner, Rayna K Matsuno, Ruth M Pfeiffer. 1. Biostatistics Branch, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20892-7244, USA. wanderso@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
PURPOSE: United States breast cancer incidence rates declined during the years 1999 to 2003, and then reached a plateau. These recent trends are impressive and may indicate an end to decades of increasing incidence. METHODS: To put emerging incidence trends into a broader context, we examined age incidence patterns (frequency and rates) during five decades. We used age density plots, two-component mixture models, and age-period-cohort (APC) models to analyze changes in the United States breast cancer population over time. RESULTS: The National Cancer Institute's Connecticut Historical Database and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program collected 600,000+ in situ and invasive female breast cancers during the years 1950 to 2003. Before widespread screening mammography in the early 1980s, breast cancer age-at-onset distributions were bimodal, with dominant peak frequency (or mode) near age 50 years and smaller mode near age 70 years. With widespread screening mammography, bimodal age distributions shifted to predominant older ages at diagnosis. From 2000 to 2003, the bimodal age distribution returned to dominant younger ages at onset, similar to patterns before mammography screening. APC models confirmed statistically significant calendar-period (screening) effects before and after 1983 to 1987. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer in the general United States population has a bimodal age at onset distribution, with modal ages near 50 and 70 years. Amid a background of previously increasing and recently decreasing incidence rates, breast cancer populations shifted from younger to older ages at diagnosis, and then back again. These dynamic fluctuations between early-onset and late-onset breast cancer types probably reflect a complex interaction between age-related biologic, risk factor, and screening phenomena.
PURPOSE: United States breast cancer incidence rates declined during the years 1999 to 2003, and then reached a plateau. These recent trends are impressive and may indicate an end to decades of increasing incidence. METHODS: To put emerging incidence trends into a broader context, we examined age incidence patterns (frequency and rates) during five decades. We used age density plots, two-component mixture models, and age-period-cohort (APC) models to analyze changes in the United States breast cancer population over time. RESULTS: The National Cancer Institute's Connecticut Historical Database and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program collected 600,000+ in situ and invasive female breast cancers during the years 1950 to 2003. Before widespread screening mammography in the early 1980s, breast cancer age-at-onset distributions were bimodal, with dominant peak frequency (or mode) near age 50 years and smaller mode near age 70 years. With widespread screening mammography, bimodal age distributions shifted to predominant older ages at diagnosis. From 2000 to 2003, the bimodal age distribution returned to dominant younger ages at onset, similar to patterns before mammography screening. APC models confirmed statistically significant calendar-period (screening) effects before and after 1983 to 1987. CONCLUSION:Breast cancer in the general United States population has a bimodal age at onset distribution, with modal ages near 50 and 70 years. Amid a background of previously increasing and recently decreasing incidence rates, breast cancer populations shifted from younger to older ages at diagnosis, and then back again. These dynamic fluctuations between early-onset and late-onset breast cancer types probably reflect a complex interaction between age-related biologic, risk factor, and screening phenomena.
Authors: Christina A Clarke; Theresa H M Keegan; Juan Yang; David J Press; Allison W Kurian; Anish H Patel; James V Lacey Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Anna N A Tosteson; Natasha K Stout; Dennis G Fryback; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Benjamin A Herman; Lucy G Hannah; Etta D Pisano Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Tasha R Smith; Wen Liu-Mares; Beth O Van Emburgh; Edward A Levine; Glenn O Allen; Jeff W Hill; Isildinha M Reis; Laura A Kresty; Mark D Pegram; Mark S Miller; Jennifer J Hu Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Mark E Sherman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Joan E Cunningham; Christine A Walters; Elizabeth G Hill; Marvella E Ford; Tiffany Barker-Elamin; Charles L Bennett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Eboneé N Butler; Chiu-Kit Tse; Mary Elizabeth Bell; Kathleen Conway; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Bassam Ghabach; William F Anderson; Rochelle E Curtis; Mark M Huycke; Jackie A Lavigne; Graça M Dores Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 6.466