Literature DB >> 21761350

Trends in distant-stage breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer incidence rates from 1992 to 2004: potential influences of screening and hormonal factors.

Jean A McDougall1, Christopher I Li.   

Abstract

Differential utilization of cancer screening between populations could lead to changes in cancer disparities. Evaluating incidence rates trends is one means of monitoring these disparities. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data, we compared annual percent changes (APC) in age-adjusted incidence rates of distant-stage breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer between non-Hispanic whites (NHW) and African Americans (AA). From 1992 to 2004, distant-stage breast cancer incidence rates remained essentially constant among both AA and NHW women, though rates were 30-90% higher among AA women throughout. NHW men and women experienced declines in distant-stage colorectal cancer incidence rates [APC = -1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.3, -0.9], but AA men and women did not. Distant-stage prostate cancer incidence rates declined for both AA (APC = -5.8, 95% CI -7.9, -3.8) and NHW (APC = -5.1, 95% CI -6.7, -3.4). Despite now having nearly equal mammography screening rates, the persistent breast cancer disparity observed among AAs compared to NHWs may be due to the greater susceptibility of AAs to more aggressive tumors, particularly hormone-receptor-negative disease, which is more difficult to detect by mammography. For colorectal cancer, greater utilization of screening tests among NHWs vs. AAs is likely a primary contributor to the observed widening disparity. Wider recognition of AA race as a prostate cancer risk factor may contribute to the narrowing disparity in the incidence of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21761350     DOI: 10.1007/s12672-009-0002-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Cancer        ISSN: 1868-8497            Impact factor:   3.869


  31 in total

1.  Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival.

Authors:  S A Joslyn; M M West
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Cancer of the colon and rectum in California: trends in incidence by race/ethnicity, stage, and subsite.

Authors:  R D Cress; C R Morris; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Explaining the race difference in prostate cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Wen-Liang Liu; Andre B Araujo; Stanislav V Kasl; Stephanie N Silvera; Hosanna Soler-Vilá; Mary G M Curnen; Robert Dubrow
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Differences in breast cancer hormone receptor status and histology by race and ethnicity among women 50 years of age and older.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Kathleen E Malone; Janet R Daling
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Breast carcinoma tumor characteristics in black and white women.

Authors:  J G Elmore; V M Moceri; D Carter; E B Larson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control--a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States).

Authors:  Phyllis A Wingo; Patricia M Jamison; Robert A Hiatt; Hannah K Weir; Paul M Gargiullo; Mary Hutton; Nancy C Lee; H Irene Hall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Association of hormone replacement therapy to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Wendy Y Chen; Susan E Hankinson; Stuart J Schnitt; Bernard A Rosner; Michelle D Holmes; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Racial differences in prostate cancer screening by family history.

Authors:  Bettina F Drake; Christopher S Lathan; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa K Dunnwald; Mary Anne Rossing; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  5 in total

1.  Association between persistence with mammography screening and stage at diagnosis among elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Breast cancer characteristics and outcomes among Hispanic Black and Hispanic White women.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Disparities in breast cancer characteristics and outcomes by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Siew Loon Ooi; Maria Elena Martinez; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  The influence of ESR1 rs9340799 and ESR2 rs1256049 polymorphisms on prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Chenying Fu; Wen-Qi Dong; Ani Wang; Guozhen Qiu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-24

5.  Estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis involving 18 studies.

Authors:  Zhenwei Gu; Gang Wang; Weiguo Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.