Literature DB >> 1767909

The King Edward Memorial Hospital 1,000 mother survey of methods of pain relief in labour.

M J Paech1.   

Abstract

A survey of one thousand women having a vaginal delivery in an obstetric teaching hospital was conducted in order to ascertain maternal opinions of various methods of pain relief in labour. Women were questioned on the day following delivery as to their pain experience, the degree of analgesia obtained, their satisfaction with and criticisms of the analgesic method or methods used, and their overall satisfaction with their childbirth experience. More pain than expected was reported significantly more often by primiparous women (P less than 0.001) and those having induced or augmented labour (P less than 0.04). Epidural analgesia was significantly more effective and resulted in greater satisfaction than other methods alone, or when used in combination (P less than 0.0001). 'Inadequate analgesia' was also reported less frequently by women using non-pharmacological methods alone (P less than 0.0001). Dissatisfaction with their experience was reported by 5% of women and was most frequently related to inadequate pain relief. Although uncommonly cited as a reason, instrumental delivery was statistically associated with dissatisfaction (P less than 0.003). The incidence of dissatisfaction did not significantly differ with respect to the analgesic method or methods used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1767909     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9101900316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  11 in total

1.  Pain relief during childbirth.

Authors:  K G Smedstad
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Obstetrical anaesthesia in Ontario.

Authors:  J Oyston
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Labour analgesia. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R L Eberle; M C Norris
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Natasha Nassar; Siranda Torvaldsen; Lyndal Trevena; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Advances in labor analgesia.

Authors:  Cynthia A Wong
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

6.  Intracutaneous Injections of Sterile Water over the Secrum for Labour Analgesia.

Authors:  Kirti N Saxena; Hitesh Nischal; S Batra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-04

7.  Pain relief in labor: a survey of awareness, attitude, and practice of health care providers in Zaria, Nigeria.

Authors:  E Ogboli-Nwasor; Se Adaji; Sb Bature; Os Shittu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Pain relief in labour: a qualitative study to determine how to support women to make decisions about pain relief in labour.

Authors:  Joanne E Lally; Richard G Thomson; Sheila MacPhail; Catherine Exley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Initiation of labor analgesia with injection of local anesthetic through the epidural needle compared to the catheter.

Authors:  Goran Ristev; Angela C Sipes; Bryan Mahoney; Jonathan Lipps; Gary Chan; John C Coffman
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 10.  More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour.

Authors:  Joanne E Lally; Madeleine J Murtagh; Sheila Macphail; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.