Literature DB >> 17675713

Breast screening in response to gain, loss, and empowerment framed messages among diverse, low-income women.

Nathan S Consedine1, David Horton, Carol Magai, Rita Kukafka.   

Abstract

Framed messaging has emerged as an important means of promoting a number of health behaviors, including breast cancer screening. However, studies of message framing have infrequently considered race and income as possible moderators of framing effects, despite their importance to screening behavior. The current study examined whether demographic characteristics moderated participant responses to message framing. In the study, 102 Black and 42 White low-income, low-screening women were randomized to a loss, gain, or empowerment frame telephone intervention and re-contacted at 6 and 12 months. Contrary to expectation, there was no main effect for framing condition, although both loss and empowerment conditions elicited superior screening than the gain condition at 12 months. Income proved an important moderator of framing effects, interacting with both condition and race to influence screening. Message frames may differ in the amount of time they require to manifest in behavioral outcomes and may lead to changes in different screening outcomes. Understanding how framing effects vary as a function of key demographic characteristics such as race and income is likely to prove important as such variables facilitate targeting of frames.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675713     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2007.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  6 in total

Review 1.  The biological and clinical effects of smoking by patients with cancer and strategies to implement evidence-based tobacco cessation support.

Authors:  Graham W Warren; Samantha Sobus; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Sensitivity of self-report mammography use in older women.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.

Authors:  A Bobridge; P Bampton; S Cole; H Lewis; G Young
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  A systematic review of health promotion interventions to increase breast cancer screening uptake: from the last 12 years.

Authors:  Feleke Doyore Agide; Roya Sadeghi; Gholamreza Garmaroudi; Bereket Molla Tigabu
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Is self-sampling to test for high-risk papillomavirus an acceptable option among women who have been treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?

Authors:  Sonia Andersson; Karen Belkić; Miriam Mints; Ellinor Östensson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systematic Review of Commercially Available Mobile Phone Applications for Prostate Cancer Education.

Authors:  Otis L Owens; Jenay M Beer; Ligia I Reyes; Tracey L Thomas
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2018-12-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.