Literature DB >> 17675534

Is microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens removed for clinically benign disease necessary?

T Andrews1, H Monaghan.   

Abstract

The likelihood of finding significant pathology in a hysterectomy specimen undertaken for clinically benign disease is low. Some data indicate that microscopic examination of these specimens may be abandoned. While this approach may seem attractive, the authors believe that there are a number of practical and clinical governance issues associated with this. Instead a pragmatic approach is advocated, with two tissue blocks (cervix and endomyometrium) being adequate in most cases.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675534     DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2007.049601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  2 in total

1.  Uterus conserving prolapse surgery--what is the chance of missing a malignancy?

Authors:  Arasee Renganathan; Robin Edwards; Jonathan R A Duckett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Prevalence of histological abnormalities in hysterectomy specimens performed for prolapse. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel C Nicholson; Aethele Khunda; Paul Ballard; Jon Rees; Carol McCormick
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.894

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.