Literature DB >> 17675526

Functional T cell responses to tumor antigens in breast cancer patients have a distinct phenotype and cytokine signature.

Margaret Inokuma1, Corazon dela Rosa, Charles Schmitt, Perry Haaland, Janet Siebert, Douglas Petry, Mengxiang Tang, Maria A Suni, Smita A Ghanekar, Daiva Gladding, John F Dunne, Vernon C Maino, Mary L Disis, Holden T Maecker.   

Abstract

The overall prevalence with which endogenous tumor Ags induce host T cell responses is unclear. Even when such responses are detected, they do not usually result in spontaneous remission of the cancer. We hypothesized that this might be associated with a predominant phenotype and/or cytokine profile of tumor-specific responses that is different from protective T cell responses to other chronic Ags, such as CMV. We detected significant T cell responses to CEA, HER-2/neu, and/or MAGE-A3 in 17 of 21 breast cancer patients naive to immunotherapy. The pattern of T cell cytokines produced in response to tumor-associated Ags (TAAs) in breast cancer patients was significantly different from that produced in response to CMV or influenza in the same patients. Specifically, there was a higher proportion of IL-2-producing CD8(+) T cells, and a lower proportion of IFN-gamma-producing CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T cells responding to TAAs compared with CMV or influenza Ags. Finally, the phenotype of TAA-responsive CD8(+) T cells in breast cancer patients was almost completely CD28(+)CD45RA(-) (memory phenotype). CMV-responsive CD8(+) T cells in the same patients were broadly distributed among phenotypes, and contained a high proportion of terminal effector cells (CD27(-)CD28(-)CD45RA(+)) that were absent in the TAA responses. Taken together, these results suggest that TAA-responsive T cells are induced in breast cancer patients, but those T cells are phenotypically and functionally different from CMV- or influenza-responsive T cells. Immunotherapies directed against TAAs may need to alter these T cell signatures to be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675526     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  22 in total

Review 1.  Use of tumour-responsive T cells as cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mary L Disis; Helga Bernhard; Elizabeth M Jaffee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Mixture models for single-cell assays with applications to vaccine studies.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Andrew McDavid; Pratip Chattopadhyay; Maria Dominguez; Steve De Rosa; Mario Roederer; Raphael Gottardo
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  The impact of inflationary cytomegalovirus-specific memory T cells on anti-tumour immune responses in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Luo; Qingda Meng; Martin Rao; Zhenjiang Liu; Georgia Paraschoudi; Ernest Dodoo; Markus Maeurer
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Local Interleukin-2 Immunotherapy of Breast Cancer: Benefit and Risk in a Spontaneous Mouse Model.

Authors:  Svetlana G Semushina; Dmitry A Aronov; Ekaterina V Moiseeva
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 5.  Standardizing immunophenotyping for the Human Immunology Project.

Authors:  Holden T Maecker; J Philip McCoy; Robert Nussenblatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 53.106

6.  Th1 epitope selection for clinically effective cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Mary L Disis; William C Watt; Denise L Cecil
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 8.110

7.  Phenotype and functional characterization of long-term gp100-specific memory CD8+ T cells in disease-free melanoma patients before and after boosting immunization.

Authors:  Edwin B Walker; Daniel Haley; Ulf Petrausch; Kevin Floyd; William Miller; Nelson Sanjuan; Greg Alvord; Bernard A Fox; Walter J Urba
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  HER2-specific T lymphocytes kill both trastuzumab-resistant and trastuzumab-sensitive breast cell lines in vitro.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Lin; Xiao-Li Wang; Bo Ma; Jun Jia; Ying Yan; Li-Jun Di; Yan-Hua Yuan; Feng-Ling Wan; Yuan-Li Lu; Xu Liang; Tao Shen; Jun Ren
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  FlowFP: A Bioconductor Package for Fingerprinting Flow Cytometric Data.

Authors:  Wade T Rogers; Herbert A Holyst
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-24

10.  Emerging concepts in biomarker discovery; the US-Japan Workshop on Immunological Molecular Markers in Oncology.

Authors:  Hideaki Tahara; Marimo Sato; Magdalena Thurin; Ena Wang; Lisa H Butterfield; Mary L Disis; Bernard A Fox; Peter P Lee; Samir N Khleif; Jon M Wigginton; Stefan Ambs; Yasunori Akutsu; Damien Chaussabel; Yuichiro Doki; Oleg Eremin; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Yoshihiko Hirohashi; Kohzoh Imai; James Jacobson; Masahisa Jinushi; Akira Kanamoto; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Kazunori Kato; Yutaka Kawakami; John M Kirkwood; Thomas O Kleen; Paul V Lehmann; Lance Liotta; Michael T Lotze; Michele Maio; Anatoli Malyguine; Giuseppe Masucci; Hisahiro Matsubara; Shawmarie Mayrand-Chung; Kiminori Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Nishikawa; A Karolina Palucka; Emanuel F Petricoin; Zoltan Pos; Antoni Ribas; Licia Rivoltini; Noriyuki Sato; Hiroshi Shiku; Craig L Slingluff; Howard Streicher; David F Stroncek; Hiroya Takeuchi; Minoru Toyota; Hisashi Wada; Xifeng Wu; Julia Wulfkuhle; Tomonori Yaguchi; Benjamin Zeskind; Yingdong Zhao; Mai-Britt Zocca; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.