Literature DB >> 17675444

Establishment and development of ruminal hydrogenotrophs in methanogen-free lambs.

Gérard Fonty1, Keith Joblin, Michel Chavarot, Remy Roux, Graham Naylor, Fabien Michallon.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine whether reductive acetogenesis can provide an alternative to methanogenesis in the rumen. Gnotobiotic lambs were inoculated with a functional rumen microbiota lacking methanogens and reared to maturity on a fibrous diet. Lambs with a methanogen-free rumen grew well, and the feed intake and ruminal volatile fatty acid concentrations for lambs lacking ruminal methanogens were lower but not markedly dissimilar from those for conventional lambs reared on the same diet. A high population density (10(7) to 10(8) cells g(-1)) of ruminal acetogens slowly developed in methanogen-free lambs. Sulfate- and fumarate-reducing bacteria were present, but their population densities were highly variable. In methanogen-free lambs, the hydrogen capture from fermentation was low (28 to 46%) in comparison with that in lambs containing ruminal methanogens (>90%). Reductive acetogenesis was not a significant part of ruminal fermentation in conventional lambs but contributed 21 to 25% to the fermentation in methanogen-free meroxenic animals. Ruminal H(2) utilization was lower in lambs lacking ruminal methanogens, but when a methanogen-free lamb was inoculated with a methanogen, the ruminal H(2) utilization was similar to that in conventional lambs. H(2) utilization in lambs containing a normal ruminal microflora was age dependent and increased with the animal age. The animal age effect was less marked in lambs lacking ruminal methanogens. Addition of fumarate to rumen contents from methanogen-free lambs increased H(2) utilization. These findings provide the first evidence from animal studies that reductive acetogens can sustain a functional rumen and replace methanogens as a sink for H(2) in the rumen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675444      PMCID: PMC2075041          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00181-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  41 in total

Review 1.  Ecological consequences of the phylogenetic and physiological diversities of acetogens.

Authors:  Harold L Drake; Kirsten Küsel; Carola Matthies
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  Postprandial changes in methanogenic and acidogenic bacteria in the rumens of steers fed high- or low-forage diets once daily.

Authors:  J A Leedle; R C Greening
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of sodium fumarate addition on rumen fermentation in vitro.

Authors:  S López; C Valdés; C J Newbold; R J Wallace
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats.

Authors:  R Puchala; B R Min; A L Goetsch; T Sahlu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  New inhibitors of methane production by rumen micro-organisms. Experiments with animals and other practical possibilities.

Authors:  J W Czerkawski; G Breckenridge
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Diversity of H2/CO2-utilizing acetogenic bacteria from feces of non-methane-producing humans.

Authors:  A Bernalier; V Rochet; M Leclerc; J Doré; P Pochart
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  H2 production by Selenomonas ruminantium in the absence and presence of methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  C C Scheifinger; B Linehan; M J Wolin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-04

8.  Most probable number enumeration of H2-utilizing acetogenic bacteria from the digestive tract of animals and man.

Authors:  J Doré; B Morvan; F Rieu-Lesme; I Goderel; P Gouet; P Pochart
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  The effect of bovicin HC5, a bacteriocin from Streptococcus bovis HC5, on ruminal methane production in vitro.

Authors:  Sang S Lee; Jih-Tay Hsu; Hilário C Mantovani; James B Russell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  In vitro H2 utilization by a ruminal acetogenic bacterium cultivated alone or in association with an archaea methanogen is stimulated by a probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Chaucheyras; G Fonty; G Bertin; P Gouet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  32 in total

1.  Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle.

Authors:  Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Zhiquan Wang; Obioha N Durunna; Stephen S Moore; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Thinking Outside the Cereal Box: Noncarbohydrate Routes for Dietary Manipulation of the Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Aspen T Reese; Rachel N Carmody
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of the composition of the cellulolytic flora on the development of hydrogenotrophic microorganisms, hydrogen utilization, and methane production in the rumens of gnotobiotically reared lambs.

Authors:  Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand; Sébastien Masséglia; Gérard Fonty; Evelyne Forano
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Methanogen colonisation does not significantly alter acetogen diversity in lambs isolated 17 h after birth and raised aseptically.

Authors:  Emma J Gagen; Pascale Mosoni; Stuart E Denman; Rafat Al Jassim; Christopher S McSweeney; Evelyne Forano
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Effects of reductive acetogenic bacteria and lauric acid on in vivo ruminal fermentation, microbial populations, and methane mitigation in Hanwoo steers in South Korea.

Authors:  Seon-Ho Kim; Lovelia L Mamuad; Yeon-Jae Choi; Ha Guyn Sung; Kwang-Keun Cho; Sang Suk Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Presence of novel, potentially homoacetogenic bacteria in the rumen as determined by analysis of formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase sequences from ruminants.

Authors:  Gemma Henderson; Graham E Naylor; Sinead C Leahy; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Functional gene analysis suggests different acetogen populations in the bovine rumen and tammar wallaby forestomach.

Authors:  Emma J Gagen; Stuart E Denman; Jagadish Padmanabha; Someshwar Zadbuke; Rafat Al Jassim; Mark Morrison; Christopher S McSweeney
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Dissecting the in vivo metabolic potential of two human gut acetogens.

Authors:  Federico E Rey; Jeremiah J Faith; James Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Robert D Stevens; Christopher B Newgard; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Rumen fermentation and acetogen population changes in response to an exogenous acetogen TWA4 strain and Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product.

Authors:  Chun-lei Yang; Le-luo Guan; Jian-xin Liu; Jia-kun Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.066

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.