Literature DB >> 17675333

Categorical QSAR Models for skin sensitization based upon local lymph node assay classification measures part 2: 4D-fingerprint three-state and two-2-state logistic regression models.

Yi Li1, Dahua Pan, Jianzhong Liu, Petra S Kern, G Frank Gerberick, Anton J Hopfinger, Yufeng J Tseng.   

Abstract

Three and four state categorical quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for skin sensitization have been constructed using data from the murine Local Lymph Node Assay studies. These are the same data we previously used to build two-state (sensitizer, nonsensitizer) QSAR models (Li et al., 2007, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20, 114-128). 4D-fingerprint descriptors derived from the 4D-molecular similarity paradigm are used to generate these models. A training set of 196 and a test set of 22 structurally diverse compounds were used in this study. Logistic regression, and partial least square coupled logistic regression were used to build the models. The three-state QSAR model gives a classification accuracy of 73.4% for the training set and 63.6% for the test set, while the random average value of classification accuracy for any three-state data set is 33.3%. The two-2-state [four categories in total] QSAR model gives a classification accuracy of 83.2% for the training set and 54.6% for the test set, while the random average value of classification accuracy for any two-2-state data set is 25%. An analysis of the skin-sensitization models developed in this study, as well as the two-state QSAR models developed in our previous analysis, suggests that the "moderate" sensitizers may be the main source of limited model accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675333     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  6 in total

1.  Categorical QSAR models for skin sensitization based on local lymph node assay measures and both ground and excited state 4D-fingerprint descriptors.

Authors:  Jianzhong Liu; Petra S Kern; G Frank Gerberick; Osvaldo A Santos-Filho; Emilio X Esposito; Anton J Hopfinger; Yufeng J Tseng
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Robert Rallo; Saji George; Zhaoxia Ji; Sumitra Nair; André E Nel; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 13.281

3.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  3D pharmacophore mapping using 4D QSAR analysis for the cytotoxicity of lamellarins against human hormone-dependent T47D breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Poonsiri Thipnate; Jianzhong Liu; Supa Hannongbua; A J Hopfinger
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  SkinSensDB: a curated database for skin sensitization assays.

Authors:  Chia-Chi Wang; Ying-Chi Lin; Shan-Shan Wang; Chieh Shih; Yi-Hui Lin; Chun-Wei Tung
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  Prediction of skin sensitization with a particle swarm optimized support vector machine.

Authors:  Hua Yuan; Jianping Huang; Chenzhong Cao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.