Literature DB >> 17673960

Why do house-hunting ants recruit in both directions?

R Planqué1, F-X Dechaume-Moncharmont, N R Franks, T Kovacs, J A R Marshall.   

Abstract

To perform tasks, organisms often use multiple procedures. Explaining the breadth of such behavioural repertoires is not always straightforward. During house hunting, colonies of Temnothorax albipennis ants use a range of behaviours to organise their emigrations. In particular, the ants use tandem running to recruit naïve ants to potential nest sites. Initially, they use forward tandem runs (FTRs) in which one leader takes a single follower along the route from the old nest to the new one. Later, they use reverse tandem runs (RTRs) in the opposite direction. Tandem runs are used to teach active ants the route between the nests, so that they can be involved quickly in nest evaluation and subsequent recruitment. When a quorum of decision-makers at the new nest is reached, they switch to carrying nestmates. This is three times faster than tandem running. As a rule, having more FTRs early should thus mean faster emigrations, thereby reducing the colony's vulnerability. So why do ants use RTRs, which are both slow and late? It would seem quicker and simpler for the ants to use more FTRs (and higher quorums) to have enough knowledgeable ants to do all the carrying. In this study, we present the first testable theoretical explanation for the role of RTRs. We set out to find the theoretically fastest emigration strategy for a set of emigration conditions. We conclude that RTRs can have a positive effect on emigration speed if FTRs are limited. In these cases, low quorums together with lots of reverse tandem running give the fastest emigration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17673960      PMCID: PMC2039849          DOI: 10.1007/s00114-007-0273-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  9 in total

1.  Ants estimate area using Buffon's needle.

Authors:  E B Mallon; N R Franks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Modelling viral and immune system dynamics.

Authors:  Alan S Perelson
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making.

Authors:  Nigel R Franks; Anna Dornhaus; Jon P Fitzsimmons; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Noise, cost and speed-accuracy trade-offs: decision-making in a decentralized system.

Authors:  James A R Marshall; Anna Dornhaus; Nigel R Franks; Tim Kovacs
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Teaching in tandem-running ants.

Authors:  Nigel R Franks; Tom Richardson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects.

Authors:  P Kirk Visscher
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 19.686

7.  Tandem calling: a new kind of signal in ant communication.

Authors:  M Möglich; U Maschwitz; B Hölldobler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter-victim systems.

Authors:  N F Britton; R Planqué; N R Franks
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism.

Authors:  Robert Planqué; Nicholas F Britton; Nigel R Franks; Mark A Peletier
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.758

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Speed versus accuracy in decision-making ants: expediting politics and policy implementation.

Authors:  Nigel R Franks; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Emma Hanmore; Jocelyn K Reynolds
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies.

Authors:  James A R Marshall; Rafal Bogacz; Anna Dornhaus; Robert Planqué; Tim Kovacs; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Trail laying during tandem-running recruitment in the ant Temnothorax albipennis.

Authors:  Norasmah Basari; Benita C Laird-Hopkins; Ana B Sendova-Franks; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-06

4.  Tandem Recruitment and Foraging in the Ponerine Ant Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius).

Authors:  C Grüter; M Wüst; A P Cipriano; F S Nascimento
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.434

5.  Migration control: a distance compensation strategy in ants.

Authors:  Thomas A O'Shea-Wheller; Ana B Sendova-Franks; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-07-18

6.  Leadership - not followership - determines performance in ant teams.

Authors:  Nathalie Stroeymeyt; Laurent Keller; Thomas O Richardson; Andrea Coti
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.