Literature DB >> 17265120

Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter-victim systems.

N F Britton1, R Planqué, N R Franks.   

Abstract

Some organisms maintain a battery of defensive strategies against their exploiters (predators, parasites or parasitoids), while others fail to employ a defence that seems obvious. In this paper, we shall investigate the circumstances under which defence strategies might be expected to evolve. Brood parasites and their hosts provide our main motivation, and we shall discuss why the reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus has evolved an egg-rejection but not a chick-rejection strategy as a defence against the common (Eurasian) cuckoo Cuculus canorus, while the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus has evolved a chick-rejection but not an egg-rejection strategy as a defence against Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo Chrysococcyx basalis. We suggest that the answers lie in strategy-blocking, where one strategy (the blocking strategy) prevents the appearance of another (the blocked strategy) that would be adaptive in its absence. This may be common in exploiter-victim systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17265120     DOI: 10.1007/s11538-006-9178-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  12 in total

1.  Why do house-hunting ants recruit in both directions?

Authors:  R Planqué; F-X Dechaume-Moncharmont; N R Franks; T Kovacs; J A R Marshall
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-08-03

2.  Coots use hatch order to learn to recognize and reject conspecific brood parasitic chicks.

Authors:  Daizaburo Shizuka; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos.

Authors:  Naomi E Langmore; Martin Stevens; Golo Maurer; Robert Heinsohn; Michelle L Hall; Anne Peters; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Collective defence portfolios of ant hosts shift with social parasite pressure.

Authors:  Evelien Jongepier; Isabelle Kleeberg; Sylwester Job; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A shared chemical basis of avian host-parasite egg colour mimicry.

Authors:  Branislav Igic; Phillip Cassey; Tomás Grim; David R Greenwood; Csaba Moskát; Jarkko Rutila; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  True recognition of nestlings by hosts selects for mimetic cuckoo chicks.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Noh; Ros Gloag; Naomi E Langmore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host.

Authors:  Tomás Grim
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Host defences against avian brood parasitism: an endocrine perspective.

Authors:  Mikus Abolins-Abols; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm?

Authors:  Tomáš Grim
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Host personality predicts cuckoo egg rejection in Daurian redstarts Phoenicurus auroreus.

Authors:  Jinggang Zhang; Peter Santema; Jianqiang Li; Lixing Yang; Wenhong Deng; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.