Literature DB >> 17672155

9- to 11-year results of cemented titanium mueller straight stem in total hip arthroplasty.

Bernd Baumann1, Christian Hendrich, Thomas Barthel, Michael Bockholt, Markus Walther, Jochen Eulert, Christof P Rader.   

Abstract

This retrospective study reviewed 9- to 11-year results after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cemented titanium stems (Mueller-Straight-Stem). Ninety-one patients (110 hips) were examined clinically and radiologically at an average 9.5-year follow-up. Revisions for aseptic loosening were performed in 4 (4%) patients. Subsidence or varus position could only be observed in one of these patients. Radiolucent lines were found in 37 patients, mainly located around the proximal zones of the stem (zone 1, 7, 8, and 14). Harris scores were good or excellent in 78% and satisfactory in 20% of patients. The 9.5-year survival rate of the cemented titanium stem with regard to aseptic loosening was 96.4%. Body weight was significantly higher (88 +/- 5.4 kg) in the 4 patients with aseptic loosening, compared to patients without radiolucent lines (75 +/- 15 kg). The body weight to stem surface ratio showed a significant difference (1.5 kg/cm2 versus 1 kg/cm2; P < .05). No significant differences were found in other factors, including sex, size or type of stem, Harris score, heterotopic ossification, or body mass index. Good long-term results can be achieved with cemented titanium stem implants. This titanium implant is recommended for patients with hypersensitivity to chrome, cobalt, and nickel. mplanting the biggest possible stem seems to be most beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672155     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20070701-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  Coordinating retrieval and register studies improves postmarket surveillance.

Authors:  Peter Ellison; Geir Hallan; Paul Johan Høl; Nils Roar Gjerdet; Leif I Havelin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-21

3.  Systemic IFNγ predicts local implant macrophage response.

Authors:  Andreas Hoene; Maciej Patrzyk; Uwe Walschus; Birgit Finke; Silke Lucke; Barbara Nebe; Karsten Schröder; Michael Schlosser
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Is there still a place for the cemented titanium femoral stem? 10,108 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Geir Hallan; Birgitte Espehaug; Ove Furnes; Helge Wangen; Paul J Høl; Peter Ellison; Leif I Havelin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Better early functional outcome after short stem total hip arthroplasty? A prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial comparing the Collum Femoris Preserving stem with a Zweymuller straight cementless stem total hip replacement for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Jakob van Oldenrijk; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Loes W A H van Beers; Carel H Geerdink; Bob B A M Niers; Wouter Runne; Mohit Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Loes W A H van Beers; Jakob van Oldenrijk; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Carel H Geerdink; Bob B A M Niers; Wouter Runne; Mohit Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.