PURPOSE: It has been hypothesized that response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on Her2 and progesterone receptor status, grading, and tumor proliferation rate. In this study, we evaluated factors that are potentially predictive of response and time to progression in patients treated with fulvestrant. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred fifty-five patients were included and followed prospectively. Patients received fulvestrant at standard dose by i.m. injection. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was done to evaluate factors potentially influencing response and time to progression. RESULTS: We observed a partial response in 19 patients (12.3%), stable disease > or =6 months in 56 patients (36.1%), stable disease >3 months but <6 months in 7 patients (4.5%), and progressive disease in 73 patients (47.1%). Median time to progression was 5 months, and median overall survival was 27 months. Probability of achieving clinical benefit was significantly associated with a low proliferation rate (P = 0.015), nonvisceral metastatic sites (P = 0.023), and first-line therapy (P = 0.023). First-line therapy was also associated with prolonged time to progression (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Response rate and time to progression are shown to be independent of Her2 status, grading, and progesterone receptor status. This is probably caused by the unique mechanism of action associated with fulvestrant: Due to receptor down-regulation, it blocks nuclear, cytoplasmatic, and membrane-bound estrogen receptor. Therefore, it seems to inhibit the cross-talk between growth factor receptor signaling and estrogen receptor in a more effective manner.
PURPOSE: It has been hypothesized that response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on Her2 and progesterone receptor status, grading, and tumor proliferation rate. In this study, we evaluated factors that are potentially predictive of response and time to progression in patients treated with fulvestrant. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred fifty-five patients were included and followed prospectively. Patients received fulvestrant at standard dose by i.m. injection. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was done to evaluate factors potentially influencing response and time to progression. RESULTS: We observed a partial response in 19 patients (12.3%), stable disease > or =6 months in 56 patients (36.1%), stable disease >3 months but <6 months in 7 patients (4.5%), and progressive disease in 73 patients (47.1%). Median time to progression was 5 months, and median overall survival was 27 months. Probability of achieving clinical benefit was significantly associated with a low proliferation rate (P = 0.015), nonvisceral metastatic sites (P = 0.023), and first-line therapy (P = 0.023). First-line therapy was also associated with prolonged time to progression (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Response rate and time to progression are shown to be independent of Her2 status, grading, and progesterone receptor status. This is probably caused by the unique mechanism of action associated with fulvestrant: Due to receptor down-regulation, it blocks nuclear, cytoplasmatic, and membrane-bound estrogen receptor. Therefore, it seems to inhibit the cross-talk between growth factor receptor signaling and estrogen receptor in a more effective manner.
Authors: C Barrios; J F Forbes; W Jonat; P Conte; W Gradishar; A Buzdar; K Gelmon; M Gnant; J Bonneterre; M Toi; C Hudis; J F R Robertson Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Christina Bjerre; Lena Vinther; Kirstine C Belling; Sidse Ø Würtz; Rachita Yadav; Ulrik Lademann; Olga Rigina; Khoa Nguyen Do; Henrik J Ditzel; Anne E Lykkesfeldt; Jun Wang; Henrik Bjørn Nielsen; Nils Brünner; Ramneek Gupta; Anne-Sofie Schrohl; Jan Stenvang Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2013-07-24
Authors: Celso A L Mello; Ludmilla T D Chinen; Samantha Cabral Severino da Silva; Carolina do Nascimento Matias; Carlos Frederico Benevides; Daniel Luiz Gimenes; Marcello F Fanelli Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Amit Agrawal; John F R Robertson; Kwok L Cheung; Eleanor Gutteridge; Ian O Ellis; Robert I Nicholson; Julia M W Gee Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 7.396