Literature DB >> 17671012

Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution.

Aidin Eslam Pour1, Javad Parvizi, Nicholas Slenker, James J Purtill, Peter F Sharkey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A rotating hinged total knee prosthesis may be utilized for the treatment of global instability or severe bone loss around the knee. Older generations of rotating hinged designs were associated with suboptimal outcomes. We evaluated the outcome of salvage knee reconstructions that had been performed with use of modern-generation modular segmental kinematic rotating hinged total knee prostheses.
METHODS: The cohort included forty-three patients (twenty-nine women and fourteen men) who underwent forty-four knee arthroplasties for the treatment of a non-neoplastic condition with use of a modern-generation kinematic rotating hinged prosthesis. Revision of a previous total knee arthroplasty in the presence of massive bone loss was the most common indication for surgery. Complete clinical and radiographic data were collected for all patients after a mean duration of follow-up of 4.2 years.
RESULTS: Reconstruction with a rotating hinged total knee prosthesis provided substantial improvement in function and reduction in pain. However, a relatively large number of complications and failures (including revision because of periprosthetic infection [three knees], aseptic loosening [four], and periprosthetic fracture [one]) were encountered, with a mean time to failure of 1.7 years. The rate of prosthetic survival was 79.6% at one year and 68.2% at five years with revision or reoperation as the end point.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the commonly held opinion that a modular kinematic rotating hinged total knee prosthesis has a role for salvage reconstruction of the knee. In light of the relatively high rate of complications, we believe that this salvage procedure should be reserved primarily for elderly and sedentary patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671012     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  43 in total

1.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Current concepts in total femoral replacement.

Authors:  Deepak Ramanathan; Marcelo Bp Siqueira; Alison K Klika; Carlos A Higuera; Wael K Barsoum; Michael J Joyce
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 4.  Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Panegrossi; Marco Ceretti; Matteo Papalia; Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

6.  Case report: Failure of rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis by disengagement of the hinge-post extension.

Authors:  Debdut Biswas; Bryan Haughom; Robert E Mayle; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Inge H F Reininga; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

Authors:  S A Hanna; W J S Aston; N J de Roeck; A Gough-Palmer; D P Powles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Keng Jin Darren Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-16

10.  Hinged total knee arthroplasty in the presence of ligamentous deficiency.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Manuel A Sandoval-García
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.