Literature DB >> 17671009

Surgical treatment of dens fractures in elderly patients.

Patrick Platzer1, Gerhild Thalhammer, Gerhard Oberleitner, Rupert Schuster, Vilmos Vécsei, Christian Gaebler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A dens fracture is the most common cervical fracture in elderly patients. The purposes of this study were to analyze the functional and radiographic results after surgical treatment of dens fractures in patients over sixty-five years of age and to compare the two methods that were used for operative treatment.
METHODS: We reviewed the cases of fifty-six patients, with an average age of 71.4 years at the time of surgery, who had undergone surgical treatment of a dens fracture from 1988 to 2002. Thirty-seven fractures were stabilized with anterior screw fixation, and nineteen fractures had posterior cervical arthrodesis.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their treatment. Thirty-five patients had a full range of neck movement, and forty-seven patients were free of pain. Technical failures occurred in eight patients. The thirty-seven patients treated with anterior screw fixation had a good clinical outcome, with fracture-healing in thirty-three patients (89%) and technical failure in five patients (14%). All nineteen patients treated with posterior cervical arthrodesis had fracture union, with technical failure in three patients, but the functional results were worse than those after anterior screw fixation. With the inclusion of the six patients who had been excluded from the clinical and radiographic review, the overall morbidity rate was 16% (ten of sixty-two patients) and the overall mortality rate was 6% (four of sixty-two patients).
CONCLUSIONS: A satisfactory outcome can be achieved with surgical treatment of a dens fracture in geriatric patients. It appears that anterior screw fixation may maintain better mobility of the cervical spine, but it appears to be associated with a higher rate of fracture nonunion and a greater potential for reoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671009     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  One-screw fixation provides similar stability to that of two-screw fixation for type II dens fractures.

Authors:  Gang Feng; Robert Wendlandt; Sebastian Spuck; Arndt P Schulz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Efficacy of anterior odontoid screw fixation in the elderly patient: a CT-based biometrical analysis of odontoid fractures.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Juliane Zenner; Alexander Auffarth; Jörg Atzwanger; Franz Romeder; Wolfgang Hitzl; Stefan Lederer; Herbert Resch; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The best surgical treatment for type II fractures of the dens is still controversial.

Authors:  Vincenzo Denaro; Rocco Papalia; Alberto Di Martino; Luca Denaro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A meta-analysis of the fusion rate from surgical treatment for odontoid factures: anterior odontoid screw versus posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Ye Shen; Jinhao Miao; Chao Li; Lei Fang; Samantha Cao; Ming Zhang; Jianhua Yan; Yong Kuang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anatomy of the dens and its implications for fracture treatment: an anatomical and radiological study.

Authors:  J Štulík; G Hodasová; M Podhráský; P Nesnídal; P Fojtík; O Naňka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Study on accuracy and interobserver reliability of the assessment of odontoid fracture union using plain radiographs or CT scans.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Klaus Kolb; Juliane Zenner; Jeremy Reynolds; Marcel Dvorak; Frank Acosta; Rosemarie Forstner; Michael Mayer; Mark Tauber; Alexander Auffarth; Anton Kathrein; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeroen G J Huybregts; Wilco C H Jacobs; Carmen L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Risk factors of non-union in Anderson-D'Alonzo type III odontoid fractures with conservative treatment.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Koshimizu; Hiroaki Nakashima; Keigo Ito; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Fumihiko Kato; Koji Sato; Masao Deguchi; Yuji Matsubara; Hidenori Inoue; Tokumi Kanemura; Tetsuya Urasaki; Hisatake Yoshihara; Norimitsu Wakao; Ryuichi Shinjo; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-29

9.  Reduction of halo pin site morbidity with a new pin care regimen.

Authors:  Hussain Anthony Kazi; Marcus de Matas; Robin Pillay
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-05-22

10.  The AOSpine North America Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Mortality Study: a retrospective review of mortality outcomes for operative versus nonoperative treatment of 322 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jens Chapman; Justin S Smith; Branko Kopjar; Alexander R Vaccaro; Paul Arnold; Christopher I Shaffrey; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.