Literature DB >> 17668312

Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli.

Amy D Lykins1, Marta Meana, Gregory P Strauss.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that sex differences in the processing of erotic material (e.g., memory, genital arousal, brain activation patterns) may also be reflected by differential attention to visual cues in erotic material. To test this hypothesis, we presented 20 heterosexual men and 20 heterosexual women with erotic and non-erotic images of heterosexual couples and tracked their eye movements during scene presentation. Results supported previous findings that erotic and non-erotic information was visually processed in a different manner by both men and women. Men looked at opposite sex figures significantly longer than did women, and women looked at same sex figures significantly longer than did men. Within-sex analyses suggested that men had a strong visual attention preference for opposite sex figures as compared to same sex figures, whereas women appeared to disperse their attention evenly between opposite and same sex figures. These differences, however, were not limited to erotic images but evidenced in non-erotic images as well. No significant sex differences were found for attention to the contextual region of the scenes. Results were interpreted as potentially supportive of recent studies showing a greater non-specificity of sexual arousal in women. This interpretation assumes there is an erotic valence to images of the sex to which one orients, even when the image is not explicitly erotic. It also assumes a relationship between visual attention and erotic valence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17668312     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  27 in total

Review 1.  Recidivism Risk Assessment for Adult Sexual Offenders.

Authors:  Brian J Holoyda; William J Newman
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  In search of anticipatory cigarette cravings: The impact of perceived smoking opportunity and motivation to seek treatment.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; John D Dimoff
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 3.  Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-08-01

4.  Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-22

5.  Women gaze behaviour in assessing female bodies: the effects of clothing, body size, own body composition and body satisfaction.

Authors:  Amelia Cundall; Kun Guo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 6.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

7.  Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Anne E Ferrey; Alexandra Frischen; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-26

8.  Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: preliminary evidence from eye movement measures.

Authors:  Peter Fromberger; Kirsten Jordan; Jakob von Herder; Henrike Steinkrauss; Rebekka Nemetschek; Georg Stolpmann; Jürgen Leo Müller
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2011-07-27

9.  The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns.

Authors:  Gerulf Rieger; Ritch C Savin-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Description-based reappraisal regulate the emotion induced by erotic and neutral images in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Jiaxin Peng; Chen Qu; Ruolei Gu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.