OBJECTIVE: To better understand the reasons for decreased survival rates in elderly patients with rectal cancer by performing an epidemiologic evaluation of age-related differences in treatment and survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of rectal cancer increases with older age, and localized disease can be curatively treated with stage-appropriate radical surgery. However, older patients have been noted to experience decreased survival. METHODS: Patients with localized rectal adenocarcinoma were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1991-2002). Cancer-specific survival by age, sex, surgery type, tumor grade, lymph node status, and use of radiation therapy was evaluated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 21,390 patients who met the selection criteria. The median age was 68 years. Each half-decade increase in age > or =70 years was associated with a 37% increase in the relative risk (RR) for cancer-related mortality (RR = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.42); decreased receipt of cancer-directed surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.63); more local excision and less radical surgery (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81); less radiotherapy (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.67); and greater likelihood of N0 pathologic stage classification (OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) (P < 0.0001 for each factor). The effect of age on cancer-specific mortality persisted in multivariate analysis with each half-decade increase in age > or =70 years resulting in a 31% increase in cancer-specific mortality (RR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.25-1.36; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients, rectal cancer is characterized by decreased cancer-related survival rates that are associated with less aggressive treatment overall and decreased disease stages at presentation. Investigation into the reasons for these treatment differences may help to define interventions to improve cancer outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To better understand the reasons for decreased survival rates in elderly patients with rectal cancer by performing an epidemiologic evaluation of age-related differences in treatment and survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of rectal cancer increases with older age, and localized disease can be curatively treated with stage-appropriate radical surgery. However, older patients have been noted to experience decreased survival. METHODS:Patients with localized rectal adenocarcinoma were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1991-2002). Cancer-specific survival by age, sex, surgery type, tumor grade, lymph node status, and use of radiation therapy was evaluated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 21,390 patients who met the selection criteria. The median age was 68 years. Each half-decade increase in age > or =70 years was associated with a 37% increase in the relative risk (RR) for cancer-related mortality (RR = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.42); decreased receipt of cancer-directed surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.63); more local excision and less radical surgery (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81); less radiotherapy (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.67); and greater likelihood of N0 pathologic stage classification (OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) (P < 0.0001 for each factor). The effect of age on cancer-specific mortality persisted in multivariate analysis with each half-decade increase in age > or =70 years resulting in a 31% increase in cancer-specific mortality (RR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.25-1.36; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients, rectal cancer is characterized by decreased cancer-related survival rates that are associated with less aggressive treatment overall and decreased disease stages at presentation. Investigation into the reasons for these treatment differences may help to define interventions to improve cancer outcomes.
Authors: J Puig-La Calle; J Quayle; H T Thaler; W Shi; P B Paty; S H Quan; A M Cohen; J G Guillem Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: D J Sargent; R M Goldberg; S D Jacobson; J S Macdonald; R Labianca; D G Haller; L E Shepherd; J F Seitz; G Francini Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Taylor Murray; Jiaquan Xu; Carol Smigal; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Paul Baron; Maureen Zakowski; Bruce D Minsky; David Blumberg; Daniel R Nathanson; Jose G Guillem; Warren E Enker; Alfred M Cohen; W Douglas Wong Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Christopher M Dodgion; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth Breen; Michael J Zinner; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-03-22 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Richard J Cassidy; Jeffrey M Switchenko; En Cheng; Renjian Jiang; Jaymin Jhaveri; Kirtesh R Patel; Daniel G Tanenbaum; Maria C Russell; Conor E Steuer; Theresa W Gillespie; Mark W McDonald; Jerome C Landry Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: C Gomez-Moreno; H Verduzco-Aguirre; S Contreras-Garduño; A Perez-de-Acha; J Alcalde-Castro; Y Chavarri-Guerra; J M A García-Lara; A P Navarrete-Reyes; J A Avila-Funes; E Soto-Perez-de-Celis Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Madhu Muralee; Rajesh Singh; Arun Peter Mathew; Kurian Cherian; K Chandramohan; Paul Augustine; S Roshni; Iqbal Ahamed Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-04-26