Literature DB >> 17665125

Experimental investigation and theoretical modelling of the nonlinear acoustical behaviour of a liver tissue and comparison with a tissue mimicking hydrogel.

Sergio Casciaro1, Christian Demitri, Francesco Conversano, Ernesto Casciaro, Alessandro Distante.   

Abstract

Native harmonics generated by nonlinear distortion of ultrasound during propagation in a medium may cause misinterpretations in spectral analysis when studying contrast agents. The aim of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate nonlinear propagation effects of diagnostic ultrasound pulses in biological tissues and to assess whether a cellulose-based hydrogel can be a suitable material for tissue mimicking purposes. Hydrogel and pig liver tissue samples of various thicknesses were insonified in a through-transmission set-up, employing 2.25-MHz pulses with different mechanical index (MI) values (range 0.06-0.60). Second harmonic and first harmonic amplitudes were extracted from spectra of received signals and their ratio was then used to compare hydrogel and liver behaviours. Resulting trends are very similar for sample thicknesses up to 8 cm and highlight a significant increase in nonlinearity for MI > 0.3, for both liver and hydrogel. A numerical procedure was also employed to calculate pressure distribution along the beam axis: these theoretical results showed a very good agreement with experimental data in the low pressure range, though failed in predicting the MI threshold. In conclusion, the hydrogel resulted to be a suitable material for manufacturing tissue mimicking phantoms, in particular to study contrast agent behaviour with a "low power approach".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17665125     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3007-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  21 in total

1.  Measurement of the contrast agent intrinsic and native harmonic response with single transducer pulse waved ultrasound systems.

Authors:  X A Verbeek; J M Willigers; P J Brands; L A Ledoux; A P Hoeks
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Nonlinear acoustics in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  Francis A Duck
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Broadband attenuation and nonlinear propagation in biological fluids: an experimental facility and measurements.

Authors:  Prashant K Verma; Victor F Humphrey; Francis A Duck
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Gray-scale second harmonic imaging of the liver with galactose-based microbubbles.

Authors:  Y Kono; F Moriyasu; Y Mine; T Nada; N Kamiyama; Y Suginoshita; T Matsumura; K Kobayashi; T Chiba
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Measurements of the nonlinearity parameter B/A of contrast agents.

Authors:  J Wu; J Tong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Delineation of experimental liver tumors in rabbits by a new ultrasound contrast agent and stimulated acoustic emission.

Authors:  P Hauff; T Fritzsch; M Reinhardt; W Weitschies; F Lüders; V Uhlendorf; D Heldmann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Contrast echocardiography for assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  R Leischik; J Rose; G Caspari; A Skyschally; G Heusch; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  A feasibility study on quantitating myocardial perfusion with Albunex, an ultrasonic contrast agent.

Authors:  B Wilson; K K Shung; B Hete; H Levene; J L Barnhart
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Contrast ultrasonography for 2-D opacification of heart cavities, peripheral vessels, kidney and muscle.

Authors:  A L Strauss; K D Beller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Cellulose-based hydrogels as body water retainers.

Authors:  A Sannino; A Esposito; L Nicolais; M A Del Nobile; A Giovane; C Balestrieri; R Esposito; M Agresti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  6 in total

1.  Theranostic applications: Non-ionizing cellular and molecular imaging through innovative nanosystems for early diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-28

2.  Estimation of intra-operator variability in perfusion parameter measurements using DCE-US.

Authors:  Marianne Gauthier; Ingrid Leguerney; Jessie Thalmensi; Mohamed Chebil; Sarah Parisot; Pierre Peronneau; Alain Roche; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-28

3.  Full experimental modelling of a liver tissue mimicking phantom for medical ultrasound studies employing different hydrogels.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Stefano Musio; Ernesto Casciaro; Christian Demitri; Alessandro Sannino
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Automatic Echographic Detection of Halloysite Clay Nanotubes in a Low Concentration Range.

Authors:  Francesco Conversano; Paola Pisani; Ernesto Casciaro; Marco Di Paola; Stefano Leporatti; Roberto Franchini; Alessandra Quarta; Giuseppe Gigli; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Echographic detectability of optoacoustic signals from low-concentration PEG-coated gold nanorods.

Authors:  Francesco Conversano; Giulia Soloperto; Antonio Greco; Andrea Ragusa; Ernesto Casciaro; Fernanda Chiriacò; Christian Demitri; Giuseppe Gigli; Alfonso Maffezzoli; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-08-09

6.  Automatic evaluation of progression angle and fetal head station through intrapartum echographic monitoring.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Ernesto Casciaro; Giulia Soloperto; Emanuele Perrone; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Antonio Perrone
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.