Literature DB >> 17662772

Experience with the Levitronix CentriMag circulatory support system as a bridge to decision in patients with refractory acute cardiogenic shock and multisystem organ failure.

Ranjit John1, Kenneth Liao, Katherine Lietz, Forum Kamdar, Monica Colvin-Adams, Andrew Boyle, Leslie Miller, Lyle Joyce.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with refractory acute cardiogenic shock and multisystem organ failure have a poor outcome with implantation of permanent ventricular assist devices. We review our experience with the use of the CentriMag (Levitronix LLC, Waltham, Mass) circulatory support system in such patients whose neurologic status was uncertain.
METHODS: From January 2004 to June 2006, 30 patients underwent CentriMag circulatory support system placement at the University of Minnesota. Of these patients, 12 were transferred from an outside hospital with refractory acute cardiogenic shock requiring biventricular support; they are the focus of this study.
RESULTS: Of our 12 study patients, 8 underwent successful bridging to the HeartMate XVE (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) ventricular assist device after biventricular support (mean support time of 9.4 days, range: 5-22 days). Another 2 patients underwent successful explantation (after 8 and 9 days); the remaining 2 patients died (after 4 days). Thus, the survival on CentriMag support, to either bridge or recovery, was 83% (10/12). Of the 8 patients who subsequently underwent HeartMate implantation, 5 also underwent a heart transplant within 6.9 months (range, 4.5-10 months), another 2 are still awaiting a transplant, and 1 died of sepsis and right ventricular failure 3 days after HeartMate implantation. Thus, for our 12 study patients, long-term survival was 75% at 1 month and 62.5% at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: Our aggressive strategy in this group of patients involved early operative intervention and implantation of biventricular support. By using this strategy, we avoided the urgent placement of expensive long-term ventricular assist devices in hemodynamically unstable patients with multisystem organ failure whose neurologic status was uncertain until end-organ recovery and excellent hemodynamic stability were achieved with the relatively inexpensive short-term CentriMag circulatory support system. The excellent midterm outcomes in this group of patients whose original prognosis was poor justify this therapeutic strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17662772     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  26 in total

1.  The first clinical case in Japan of destination therapy using the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Sokichi Kamata; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Takashi Yamauchi; Koji Takeda; Shunsuke Saito; Takayoshi Ueno; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  The Lillehei Heart Institute: building on the shoulders of giants.

Authors:  Daniel J Garry
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Surgical implant techniques of left ventricular assist devices: an overview of acute and durable devices.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for the post-cardiotomy patient.

Authors:  Priyadharshanan Ariyaratnam; Lindsay A McLean; Alexander R J Cale; Mahmoud Loubani
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  In vivo testing of a novel blood pump for short-term extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Nicholas R Teman; David S Demos; Benjamin S Bryner; Bradley Faliks; Emilia M Jahangir; Daniel E Mazur; Alvaro Rojas-Pena; Robert H Bartlett; Jonathan W Haft
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Mechanical circulatory support: devices, outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Carmelo A Milano; Alan A Simeone
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  Cardiogenic shock in ACS. Part 1: prediction, presentation and medical therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Rajesh Kharbanda; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Role of percutaneous veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge to left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Koichi Toda; Tomoyuki Fujita; Osamu Seguchi; Masanobu Yanase; Takeshi Nakatani
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Paracorporeal ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant candidacy in the era of implantable continuous-flow ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Hideaki Suwa; Osamu Seguchi; Tomoyuki Fujita; Yoshihiro Murata; Michinari Hieda; Takuya Watanabe; Takuma Sato; Haruki Sunami; Masanobu Yanase; Hiroki Hata; Takeshi Nakatani
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 1.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.