OBJECTIVES: To examine trajectories of change in everyday function for individuals with cognitive deficits suggestive of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). DESIGN: Using data from the longitudinal, multisite Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study allowed for post hoc classification of MCI status at baseline using psychometric definitions for amnestic MCI, nonamnestic MCI, multidomain MCI, and no MCI. SETTING: Six U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand eight hundred thirty-two volunteers (mean age 74; 26% African American) living independently, recruited from senior housing, community centers, hospitals, and clinics. MEASUREMENTS: Mixed-effect models examined changes in self-reported activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) from the Minimum Data Set Home Care Interview in 2,358 participants over a 3-year period. RESULTS: In models for IADL performance, IADL difficulty, and a daily functioning composite, there was a significant time by MCI classification interaction for each MCI subtype, indicating that all MCI groups showed faster rates of decline in everyday function than cognitively normal participants with no MCI. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate the importance of MCI as a clinical entity that not only predicts progression to dementia, but also predicts functional declines in activities that are key to autonomy and quality of life. MCI classification guidelines should allow for functional changes in MCI, and clinicians should monitor for such changes. Preservation of function may serve as a meaningful outcome for intervention efforts.
OBJECTIVES: To examine trajectories of change in everyday function for individuals with cognitive deficits suggestive of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). DESIGN: Using data from the longitudinal, multisite Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study allowed for post hoc classification of MCI status at baseline using psychometric definitions for amnestic MCI, nonamnestic MCI, multidomain MCI, and no MCI. SETTING: Six U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand eight hundred thirty-two volunteers (mean age 74; 26% African American) living independently, recruited from senior housing, community centers, hospitals, and clinics. MEASUREMENTS: Mixed-effect models examined changes in self-reported activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) from the Minimum Data Set Home Care Interview in 2,358 participants over a 3-year period. RESULTS: In models for IADL performance, IADL difficulty, and a daily functioning composite, there was a significant time by MCI classification interaction for each MCI subtype, indicating that all MCI groups showed faster rates of decline in everyday function than cognitively normal participants with no MCI. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate the importance of MCI as a clinical entity that not only predicts progression to dementia, but also predicts functional declines in activities that are key to autonomy and quality of life. MCI classification guidelines should allow for functional changes in MCI, and clinicians should monitor for such changes. Preservation of function may serve as a meaningful outcome for intervention efforts.
Authors: J B Jobe; D M Smith; K Ball; S L Tennstedt; M Marsiske; S L Willis; G W Rebok; J N Morris; K F Helmers; M D Leveck; K Kleinman Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2001-08
Authors: Matthias H Tabert; Jennifer J Manly; Xinhua Liu; Gregory H Pelton; Sara Rosenblum; Marni Jacobs; Diana Zamora; Madeleine Goodkind; Karen Bell; Yaakov Stern; D P Devanand Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-08
Authors: M C Carlson; L P Fried; Q L Xue; K Bandeen-Roche; S L Zeger; J Brandt Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Sarah E Cook; Michael Marsiske; Kelsey R Thomas; Frederick W Unverzagt; Virginia G Wadley; Jessica B S Langbaum; Michael Crowe Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Caroline L Lassen-Greene; Kayla Steward; Ozioma Okonkwo; Ellen Porter; Michael Crowe; David E Vance; H Randall Griffith; Karlene Ball; Daniel C Marson; Virginia G Wadley Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Amy J Jak; Katherine J Bangen; Christina E Wierenga; Lisa Delano-Wood; Jody Corey-Bloom; Mark W Bondi Journal: Int Rev Neurobiol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 3.230
Authors: Melissa L O'Connor; Jerri D Edwards; Virginia G Wadley; Michael Crowe Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Michael Schwenk; Marwan Sabbagh; Ivy Lin; Pharah Morgan; Gurtej S Grewal; Jane Mohler; David W Coon; Bijan Najafi Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2016
Authors: Sarah E Cook; Michael Marsiske; Kelsey R Thomas; Frederick W Unverzagt; Virginia G Wadley; Jessica B S Langbaum; Michael Crowe Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: O C Okonkwo; H R Griffith; J N Copeland; K Belue; S Lanza; E Y Zamrini; L E Harrell; J C Brockington; D Clark; R Raman; D C Marson Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 9.910