Literature DB >> 17661810

A comparison of counselee and counselor satisfaction in reproductive genetic counseling.

C M Aalfs1, F J Oort, J C J M de Haes, N J Leschot, E M A Smets.   

Abstract

Important insights in the process of genetic counseling can be provided by establishing levels of satisfaction. The aim of our study was to compare counselees' and counselors' satisfaction with the initial consultation in reproductive genetic counseling and to gain insight into the factors associated with their contentment. One hundred and fifty-one women and 11 counselors participated in this study. Pre-test questionnaires included counselees' socio-demographic, physical and psychological characteristics, i.e. their degree of worry, expectations, preferred participation in decision making and experienced degree of control. Post-visit questionnaires asked for counselees' and counselors' satisfaction, counselees' participation in decision making and counselees' Perceived Personal Control (PPC). Little difference was found between counselees' and counselors' overall visit-specific satisfaction (mean 79 vs 74, respectively, on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100). The correlation between counselees' and counselors' satisfaction was medium sized (r = 0.26, p < 0.01). Counselees' satisfaction was positively associated with being pregnant and with their post-visit PPC. Counselors' satisfaction was positively associated with counselees' post-visit PPC. No other counselee and counselor related variables appeared to be associated with satisfaction, nor was the duration of the consultation. Our findings suggest that, although both groups were satisfied with the consultation, counselees and counselors do not always have equal perceptions of the consultation process and may form their evaluation in different ways. In the assessment of quality of care, evaluation of both counselees' and counselors' satisfaction deserves more attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17661810     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00834.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  12 in total

1.  Roles of genetic counselors in South Africa.

Authors:  Jennifer G R Kromberg; Tina-Marié Wessels; Amanda Krause
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Deaf genetic testing and psychological well-being in deaf adults.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Joshua L Deignan; Yoko Kobayashi; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne Grody; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Who is being referred to cancer genetic counseling? Characteristics of counselees and their referral.

Authors:  E van Riel; S van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-17

4.  Mothers' experiences of genetic counselling in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Authors:  Megan Morris; Merlyn Glass; Tina-Marié Wessels; Jennifer G R Kromberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling of adults with Williams syndrome: a first study.

Authors:  Katrina Farwig; Amanda G Harmon; Kristina M Fontana; Carolyn B Mervis; Colleen A Morris
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 6.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

7.  Intrusion and avoidance in subjects undergoing genetic investigation and counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit R Hanestad; Anniken Hamang; Odd E Havik
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Clients' Perception of Outcome of Team-Based Prenatal and Reproductive Genetic Counseling in Serbian Service Using the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire.

Authors:  Goran Cuturilo; Olivera Kontic Vucinic; Ivana Novakovic; Svetlana Ignjatovic; Marija Mijovic; Nenad Sulovic; Dusan Vukolic; Milica Komnenic; Jasmina Tadic; Aleksandar Cetkovic; Aleksandra Belic; Aleksandar Ljubic
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Patient satisfaction in neurological second opinions and tertiary referrals.

Authors:  D Wijers; L Wieske; M D I Vergouwen; E Richard; J Stam; E M A Smets
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  A randomized experimental study to test the effects of discussing uncertainty during cancer genetic counseling: different strategies, different outcomes?

Authors:  Niki M Medendorp; Marij A Hillen; Leonie N C Visser; Cora M Aalfs; Floor A M Duijkers; Klaartje van Engelen; Margreet G E M Ausems; Senno Verhoef; Anne M Stiggelbout; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.